who the hell ever said the SEC gave a damn about t
Post# of 43064
it was totally fungible .. which is why it's so damn ironic that what was
once the sole province of the OTC *morphed* up the Equity food chain
after *grandfathering* in 2005 .. think 2007/2008 .. and while it's taken
damn near a decade .. *change* is slowly coming .. hence the T+2 this week ..
by the time they actually implement *real time* change that can't be loopholed
and manipulated .. odds are we will both be 6 feet under
remember the *crews* working IHUB .. including the author of the first hit piece
on PTOI .. extolling the bullshit that no OTC stocks were ever shorted?
hmmmm ..
too bad the live daily reg sho link from Finra showed them to be the liars they are and were by 2010
but they ruled the roost and controlled outcomes by rote
what creates an issue for colluding entities is when an actual OTC target *survives*
so far .. as galling as it is for some .. P2O still survives
4kids
Quote:
Personally, I don't think the SEC gives a damn about the NSS theory. My guess is they figure they sued the company, forced the founder to take a ban....they probably figure if investors still want to remain, they deserve what they get.
Not saying I agree, but in the grand scheme of all the schemes, PTOI is a pimple on an elephants ass.