really commando .. this indicates otherwise ..

really commando ..

this indicates otherwise ..

Quote:

---

Bid sitters....aka stuck bag holders.

---

===

Quote:

---

As far as no solutions, many have given solutions. Maybe you're not reading closely.

I've said numerous time what I think should be done or should have been done. All we get are vague filings. No specifics on where the money Heddle has "invested", which many use to tout his commitment, has gone.

Hasn't gone to R&D, hasn't gone to fix the plant, hasn't gone to pay vendors, hasn't gone to fund an AGM in 4 years.

---

Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=472...z4rR9DayQc

i agree some have provided suggestions .. including this post of mine
which i've reiterated the same info for 2 years now .. others have chimed in
as well here with suggestions for mgmt .. many email RH directly

Posted On: 08/11/2017 3:23:11 PM
Avatar
Posted By: 4kids
Re: DZ25 #36513

i wouldn't expect any new investors into P2O .. until mgmt gives them a reason to be

a good IR and imo CI was excellent is also required .. but i don't see that as a
priority .. what i do see as a priority are RH's form/s updated as the CFO's were
almost one year ago .. seating a BoD .. holding an AGM .. and consistently
articulating the company's vision and expectations of execution .. blending site
being leased imo is a bonus that goes some way towards reducing the monthly
burn rate *if* intent is to bring NF back on line .. which imo doesn't have to be done

as i've noted there are many options mgmt has .. whether they ever get discussed
by mgmt .. only they know

4kids


Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=469...z4rRFTVb00


i've also regularly emailed P2O's CEO with suggestions .. some of which
seemed to be implemented .. and others seemingly totally ignored


but that doesn't change the *fact* that the only aspect retail investors control
is their respective DD .. and whether they buy/sell or hold shares
and you most definitely mocked those choices made by other P2O investors



======
look familiar? .. i could literally go back 2 years' worth of the same

Posted On: 08/10/2017 12:27:45 PM
Avatar
Posted By: 4kids
Re: Commando911 #36483

not being mgmt i can only give you the same response i gave you previously when this dance was last undertaken

the obvious answer is there is no *sales* team .. either external or internal re: P2O .. beyond mgmt

as i noted *previously* .. some could argue that Eco wasn't given enough time
but those posts were few against those who wanted *instant*

selling the first sale of a multi million $ disruptive tech is complex and incredibly time consuming

and that is with everything being *seamless* .. that isn't P2O which as we both
know has been a *target* since 2009

.. so the
approach i would have taken .. going the route of those *campuses*
with sustainable protocols in their corporate governance and cash to dedicate
to say nothing of the room to implement .. clearly isn't on the table ..

but that doesn't matter if RC .. who has installed a multi million $ site previously
can re-do that effort .. reading between the lines of MOU .. round 1 vs round 2
i'd say the site expected in round 1 has changed .. so the ? to be asked is
is this new site's infrastructure in place or being started from the ground up
and if so .. what is a realistic time frame for RC's investors to give because
if there is no infrastructure .. just raw land .. imo time line ramps to say nothing
of permitting .. and since i've PM'd you this multiple times .. it's not NYSDEC
permits that i'm referencing .. it's state and local for implementing this tech

remember the state of Indiana's time line .. 2018 - 2020 .. on *news* from the fall of 2016

again what i've stressed is *communication* out of RH that articulates on a layman's level

imo consistent communication is key for many (clearly not all)

4kids

Quote:
so why is making a sale so monumentally difficult?


Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=469...z4rRDY4Eka



Posted On: 08/18/2017 10:28:02 AM
Avatar
Posted By: 4kids
Re: Commando911 #36622

not sure i agree with that opinion .. it will depend on what sequence of material
events are executed and if done sans significant dilution

if a partnership/merger or 2nd sale is 8k'd in conjunction with the first sale
and ancillary material events (BoD/AGM/Blending site leased or sold) are 8k'd
imo PTOI's rise won't be able to be *held/stalled* .. rather meteoric based on
almost 5 years of relentlessly resetting PTOI down .. with no *outlet/release* to the upside

what is so remarkable about OTC survivors that outlast *years* of efforts by NR
is what *volume* conveys ..

cycles of money usually *show* by NR every 6 to 12 months (UP/DOWN rinse/repeat)

PTOI was last *run* in Jan 2013 .. that will be 5 years in January .. that is imo beyond significant

one can take the volume in aggregate and slice it any way one likes .. it's massive even if only done with a *tiny percentage*

now if mgmt doesn't execute *anything* between now and Jan .. clearly there will
be some actual P2O investors who may sell .. but as has been pointed out for a
few years now .. YOY *volume* continues to decrease .. even with 3M settlement
cert and the 1M cert for *trash* added into the mix over the past few years

founder hasn't sold and imo won't be .. which is also another issue NR *faces* ..

2017 is tracking 2009's volume .. and actual P2O investors continue to pick away

it is what it is ..

4kids

Quote:
yes, in, even with execution. I will be a non event. Buying will be created by demand. But will be attributed to "covering".


Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=470...z4rRHpNNq8


====

so what exactly are you looking for from fellow P2O investors

that is the ? to actually be answered very specifically .. based on your posts *here*

4kids