alternative posts that don't libel .. malign or co
Post# of 43066
(Total Views: 193)
Posted On: 09/01/2017 9:23:18 AM
alternative posts that don't libel .. malign or contain factually false info .. or
reference *deletions* and the like .. do remain .. alternative posts are always
welcome provided they follow this site's TOS .. this site isn't the vehicle of choice
what many actual P2O investors *here* notice is that the board *there* is
one of the walking dead .. populated almost always by negative posts
this site has few positive posts .. but upon occasion one slips thru ..
we all get the PPS action .. some of us have noted for years what NRs' goal is
those who don't believe that there is any abusive shorting going on .. so be it
how to explain the total lack of volume in relation to other fully compliant OTCQB
stox/co.s whose float and IO are on par with PTOI .. but do avg daily volume of 1M ~
again .. what has always threatened a segment *controlling* .. the vehicle of choice
is very simple .. daily reg sho %s .. documentation done showing *volume* avgs
and daily tapes of trades showing the incredibly obvious resetting being done
this isn't retail .. it never has been .. and i find it beyond disingenuous that the
efforts of the original crew .. get dismissed as if their effects from 2009 - 2013
would have had no impact .. that carries thru to this day
that doesn't absolve current mgmt of their responsibilities ..
there are more than a few actual P2O investors who've expressed privately to me
that they wish that P2O hadn't been wrested back in mid August 2013
because 4 years of relentless compression is both exhausting and frustrating
again .. no one here controls anything beyond their respective DD and whether
they buy/sell or hold their PTOI *shares*
everyone has made their respective choices .. why is it so hard for some to respect others' choices
every one here is an adult ..most likely some have mentally written off their investment
none of the negatives have changed the *volume* avgs .. tape of trades reveals
every mirrored set (some times multiple sets) being done .. it is what it is and
isn't *retail*
the rest falls on current mgmt to articulate to actual investors and execute
4kids
reference *deletions* and the like .. do remain .. alternative posts are always
welcome provided they follow this site's TOS .. this site isn't the vehicle of choice
what many actual P2O investors *here* notice is that the board *there* is
one of the walking dead .. populated almost always by negative posts
this site has few positive posts .. but upon occasion one slips thru ..
we all get the PPS action .. some of us have noted for years what NRs' goal is
those who don't believe that there is any abusive shorting going on .. so be it
how to explain the total lack of volume in relation to other fully compliant OTCQB
stox/co.s whose float and IO are on par with PTOI .. but do avg daily volume of 1M ~
again .. what has always threatened a segment *controlling* .. the vehicle of choice
is very simple .. daily reg sho %s .. documentation done showing *volume* avgs
and daily tapes of trades showing the incredibly obvious resetting being done
this isn't retail .. it never has been .. and i find it beyond disingenuous that the
efforts of the original crew .. get dismissed as if their effects from 2009 - 2013
would have had no impact .. that carries thru to this day
that doesn't absolve current mgmt of their responsibilities ..
there are more than a few actual P2O investors who've expressed privately to me
that they wish that P2O hadn't been wrested back in mid August 2013
because 4 years of relentless compression is both exhausting and frustrating
again .. no one here controls anything beyond their respective DD and whether
they buy/sell or hold their PTOI *shares*
everyone has made their respective choices .. why is it so hard for some to respect others' choices
every one here is an adult ..most likely some have mentally written off their investment
none of the negatives have changed the *volume* avgs .. tape of trades reveals
every mirrored set (some times multiple sets) being done .. it is what it is and
isn't *retail*
the rest falls on current mgmt to articulate to actual investors and execute
4kids
(3)
(0)