Sox, Those 941 shares should be legal short shares

Sox, Those 941 shares should be legal short shares, correct? The illegal naked short shares that Alan alludes to aren't reported, are they? If they were, they wouldn't be "naked", would they? Why are the forces at the swamp so intent on bashing IPIX with the frequency and intensity that they do? Why do the MM's constantly play games with the trades that they do? Why have hit piece after hit piece been written to defame IPIX? What other reason makes as much sense for our current state of affairs?

Lord, help me to be the person that my dogs think I am...