The story of iTraq/Indegogo was another: It was th
Post# of 1559
(Total Views: 1045)
Posted On: 08/25/2017 11:21:24 PM
The story of iTraq/Indegogo was another: It was the indignation of the buyers when the first delivery date was not fulfilled. Neither with two extensions. The second indignation of those buyers was that the owner of iTraq offered to comply with giving them a different device made by him and himself did not fulfill the benefits of the original.
Roman agreed customers were not satisfied to receive something that was not the originally offered, would return the money.
About the TV program, what was said was the imperative to fulfill CERTIFICATION process. Funding was the very issue. The last we knew about was 75% of the Process was fulfilled. The strong and daily attack via "LieHube" made impossible to use funding from selling shares. Finally, Gregg decides to stand by the communication converting GTRQ in a nonreporting OTC.
Next came the 4X increase A/S and then the change GEOTRAQ to GO TRAQ. Signals that something was brewing behind the scenes.
We can not say at this moment how Good can be the (module) device and its technology. But there are 2 facts that say all except "Useless technology". First the fact Gregg change the name from GEOTRAQ to GO TRAQ.
Why this change? Why that money? There was a mind working on the project and for some reason he wanted to build the brand more to CONSUMER appeal (than Industrial, not excluding of course).
By the other band, there was someone interested in the project. Not a bad company as far as I can see.
A project sold at $ 200.000 is maybe the one that concerns me. Yes, there is a NASDAQ company that pay to have it. A Good performance company one. So, there is a value there.
From here I do not know which way to be. Time will tell
(a) Gregg was in a desperate situation and sold his invention for just pennies with a personal loss of maybe more than -5X as it was said that he invest or raise to the project 1 Million Dollars?
(b) It is a good invention, but never the great it was sold to us?
At least I can think of these 2, ... time will tell
Roman agreed customers were not satisfied to receive something that was not the originally offered, would return the money.
About the TV program, what was said was the imperative to fulfill CERTIFICATION process. Funding was the very issue. The last we knew about was 75% of the Process was fulfilled. The strong and daily attack via "LieHube" made impossible to use funding from selling shares. Finally, Gregg decides to stand by the communication converting GTRQ in a nonreporting OTC.
Next came the 4X increase A/S and then the change GEOTRAQ to GO TRAQ. Signals that something was brewing behind the scenes.
We can not say at this moment how Good can be the (module) device and its technology. But there are 2 facts that say all except "Useless technology". First the fact Gregg change the name from GEOTRAQ to GO TRAQ.
Why this change? Why that money? There was a mind working on the project and for some reason he wanted to build the brand more to CONSUMER appeal (than Industrial, not excluding of course).
By the other band, there was someone interested in the project. Not a bad company as far as I can see.
A project sold at $ 200.000 is maybe the one that concerns me. Yes, there is a NASDAQ company that pay to have it. A Good performance company one. So, there is a value there.
From here I do not know which way to be. Time will tell
(a) Gregg was in a desperate situation and sold his invention for just pennies with a personal loss of maybe more than -5X as it was said that he invest or raise to the project 1 Million Dollars?
(b) It is a good invention, but never the great it was sold to us?
At least I can think of these 2, ... time will tell
(0)
(0)Traack Technologies Inc. (TRAA) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼