it's interesting .. i come back to the 4 reasons *

it's interesting .. i come back to the 4 reasons *imo* why P2O still survives

first is the founders disruptive tech .. which went from table top to flagship
in approx 4 years and has been independently validated and permitted in NYS

second is former director's documentation which forced the hand of some large
investors back in 2013 .. and led to P2O being wrested back mid August 2013

third is the monies current CEO put into P2O in the Fall of 2013 .. which had to go directly to the actions undertaken by prior mgmt

lastly and imo the exact reason why for the most part YOY *volume* has decreased
since 2013/2014 .. is actual P2O shareholders (investors) not those who trade
in and out or those who've never been invested .. rather have taken root on various SMBs to whine daily and create FUD

does P2O have issues .. sure it does .. every targeted OTC company that
remains a survivor will have them .. some more than others because as many
understand .. effectively crippling mgmt by targeting the stock is a no brainer

but P2O also has options .. which oddly enough by those proffering financial advice sans broker's license ..
never gets discussed on any SMB by non investors

last August P2O sourced 600k .. this year an asset was sold and an insurance
settlement ensured P2O's *survival* yet again ..

add to the fact that P2O's founder is never far away and able to be accessed

toss in those options that never see the light of day on any SMB by those whose angst ratchets at odd times

and it makes for an interesting *mix*

there are very specific material events .. i personally am looking for out of mgmt
but i want them done in a sequence that prevents NRs' *usual orchestration*

there are no guarantees in life and if NR *can* .. they will try to reset the clock on PTOI's 52 week low .. but what else is new ..

any investor who has lasted till now .. has seen it all b4

4kids

Quote:

---

So now you have chosen to agree with a poster who's reasons for being here 365 a year for years on end are very suspect. He's a non shareholder who has NEVER had one positive thing to say about the company that you're invested in. Nothing positive about the founder, the technology, the market, or any of it's employees or investors.

Give your head a shake!!!!!

---