This is the correct answer, imho, There is a ton o
Post# of 15187
(Total Views: 816)
Posted On: 08/20/2017 12:37:42 PM
This is the correct answer, imho, There is a ton of
shorting on the OTC, due to the lenders wanting to double dip with additional shares from notes and then shorting the stock to lower the pps for a greater % of shares,the next conversion round.
Most of these debtors get shares at a discpunt of 30,50,and higher percentages. They certainly don't want the pps to go up and get less shares and interest on their notes.Less shares=less gains on their original loans.These guys want 100% returns and higher.Not the standard 3-10%
The OTC is litered with shorts, who work in tandem with the lenders for pps manipulation and greater returns on each note.
It wouldn't shock me if there were between 50-300 million shares short here, depending on the amount of notes that were still in play -payable by hjoe before they stopped payment.
But, it's all speculative on my part on hjoes situation. But on the OTC it's rampant and an unfair advantage for the lender. That's how we got to this point with JOE.
Jmho,
Ts
shorting on the OTC, due to the lenders wanting to double dip with additional shares from notes and then shorting the stock to lower the pps for a greater % of shares,the next conversion round.
Most of these debtors get shares at a discpunt of 30,50,and higher percentages. They certainly don't want the pps to go up and get less shares and interest on their notes.Less shares=less gains on their original loans.These guys want 100% returns and higher.Not the standard 3-10%
The OTC is litered with shorts, who work in tandem with the lenders for pps manipulation and greater returns on each note.
It wouldn't shock me if there were between 50-300 million shares short here, depending on the amount of notes that were still in play -payable by hjoe before they stopped payment.
But, it's all speculative on my part on hjoes situation. But on the OTC it's rampant and an unfair advantage for the lender. That's how we got to this point with JOE.
Jmho,
Ts
(4)
(0)