My last responce to this. But again, delaying c
Post# of 15187
(Total Views: 1201)
Posted On: 08/19/2017 11:43:23 PM
My last responce to this.
But again, delaying coming back because they are growing doesn't make sense. Does that mean as long as they are growing, they aren't coming back?
Answer: As an investor, you want the company to come back financial stable. Coming back is very easy, for the impatient, if you want dilution again.The company can trade again,without any financial foundation, and in days be wipe out/the"impatient shares out." If you can do some reasearch about book to bill ratios and beverage business, you would understand that revenues are plowed back into a company for the next product run. (To eventually get to a break even point, where a company builds a profit base and then can draw a surplus from it.) Anyone who has a business acumen/background can tell you that even if you have deals in place, that are announced, the money flows in much later after the deal is finalized. Most deals are like a credit card, where the product is shipped and then the buyer has 60-90-120 days to pay off a certain balance remaining on a deal. Some deals, like C.K. Gov contract won't be paid till mid 2018. So, they need cash flow and stability to return ,thus protecting your shares.- consisten sales on multiply fronts to have a surplus to have the cash to refile. That means c.k and other entities need several quarters of selling product.
The tipping point they think there is enough growth to come back.
Answer: When they don't need any other lender/note ,to ruin your /mine/and the companies preferred shares-f share compensation shares
Burning the sorts isn't my concern. My investment isn't based on shorts but coming back.
Answer: Your investment is tied to burning the shorts. Coming back, just to come back would allow shorts to crush your investment within days and have your shares worthless forever. If the company doesn't have constant revenue/cash flow and ongoing news and they trade, you have no investment to speak of anyways.
I just can't get a substantial answer.
Answer:Well I have given you my thoughts on each question. I know it's not easy to wait, but you have a much better shot waiting and seeing these develop then trading immediately and getting wiped out in day/days. (See my notes comment) Hjoe is not getting a traditional loan, nor will they take on notes. So, they have to build revenues through sales of distributors, c.k, and Jerky.
If you have been following, there was a delay with c.k.,last year, and they are just now starting to sell product. Without sales, there is no way to pay for the relicensing fees and legality.
I hope this helps you. If not please contact hangoverjoes or another stockholder.
I do sympathize with you. But, you also have to see this based on a business model.
P.S. there can be no official announcement or plan before notes and debts are paid. The company has to complete this task before any plans are talked about.
TS
But again, delaying coming back because they are growing doesn't make sense. Does that mean as long as they are growing, they aren't coming back?
Answer: As an investor, you want the company to come back financial stable. Coming back is very easy, for the impatient, if you want dilution again.The company can trade again,without any financial foundation, and in days be wipe out/the"impatient shares out." If you can do some reasearch about book to bill ratios and beverage business, you would understand that revenues are plowed back into a company for the next product run. (To eventually get to a break even point, where a company builds a profit base and then can draw a surplus from it.) Anyone who has a business acumen/background can tell you that even if you have deals in place, that are announced, the money flows in much later after the deal is finalized. Most deals are like a credit card, where the product is shipped and then the buyer has 60-90-120 days to pay off a certain balance remaining on a deal. Some deals, like C.K. Gov contract won't be paid till mid 2018. So, they need cash flow and stability to return ,thus protecting your shares.- consisten sales on multiply fronts to have a surplus to have the cash to refile. That means c.k and other entities need several quarters of selling product.
The tipping point they think there is enough growth to come back.
Answer: When they don't need any other lender/note ,to ruin your /mine/and the companies preferred shares-f share compensation shares
Burning the sorts isn't my concern. My investment isn't based on shorts but coming back.
Answer: Your investment is tied to burning the shorts. Coming back, just to come back would allow shorts to crush your investment within days and have your shares worthless forever. If the company doesn't have constant revenue/cash flow and ongoing news and they trade, you have no investment to speak of anyways.
I just can't get a substantial answer.
Answer:Well I have given you my thoughts on each question. I know it's not easy to wait, but you have a much better shot waiting and seeing these develop then trading immediately and getting wiped out in day/days. (See my notes comment) Hjoe is not getting a traditional loan, nor will they take on notes. So, they have to build revenues through sales of distributors, c.k, and Jerky.
If you have been following, there was a delay with c.k.,last year, and they are just now starting to sell product. Without sales, there is no way to pay for the relicensing fees and legality.
I hope this helps you. If not please contact hangoverjoes or another stockholder.
I do sympathize with you. But, you also have to see this based on a business model.
P.S. there can be no official announcement or plan before notes and debts are paid. The company has to complete this task before any plans are talked about.
TS
(6)
(0)Hangover Joe's Holding Corporation (HJOE) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼