I think that if there were significant adverse eff
Post# of 72433
And yes, the company shouldn't know anything about results at this point.
The company not knowing anything protects them from any accusations of leaking information that could lead to insider trading. Ask Martha Stewart if she thinks that's a good idea
![](/images/icons/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Like This Post](/images/thumb-up.png)
![Dislike This Post](/images/thumb-down.png)