The VERY first question that should have occurred
Post# of 123723
(Total Views: 207)
Posted On: 08/12/2017 11:00:30 PM
Re: wowhappens28 #1406
The VERY first question that should have occurred to you when you viewed the video is; what about the airline fight plans and passenger manifests? WTF happened to all those people and to those 4 planes, including those on the flights that 'landed' in PA and DC?
The second question is how do you know that what your viewing is not current CGI technology? Please find news footage from any of the networks covering the event live that show an airplane nose exiting from either building. You can't, because it simply didn't happen as depicted in the video. What you're watching IS the doctored video.
Neither question occurred to you because you STARTED with a predisposition to believe a conspiracy theory, which rendered whatever level of critical thinking skills you have.......useless.
You also ignored every other point made in the piece I posted.
Therefore you conspiracy theory has collapsed as completely as did the World Trade Center Towers.
Rich and satisfying is the irony in THAT. LOL!
The second question is how do you know that what your viewing is not current CGI technology? Please find news footage from any of the networks covering the event live that show an airplane nose exiting from either building. You can't, because it simply didn't happen as depicted in the video. What you're watching IS the doctored video.
Neither question occurred to you because you STARTED with a predisposition to believe a conspiracy theory, which rendered whatever level of critical thinking skills you have.......useless.
You also ignored every other point made in the piece I posted.
Therefore you conspiracy theory has collapsed as completely as did the World Trade Center Towers.
Quote:
No-planes theory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy...nes_theory
The "no-plane theory", promoted via Internet videos, claims that this shot of the second impact, taken from a news helicopter, depicts a video composite of a Boeing 767 accidentally appearing from behind a Layer Mask.
Nico Haupt and former chief economist within the Labor Department under the Bush administration, Morgan Reynolds, argue that no planes were used in the attacks. Reynolds claims it is physically impossible that the Boeing planes of Flights 11 and 175 could have penetrated the steel frames of the Towers, and that digital compositing was used to depict the plane crashes in both news reports and subsequent amateur video.
"There were no planes, there were no hijackers", Reynolds insists. "I know, I know, I'm out of the mainstream, but that's the way it is". According to David Shayler, 'the only explanation is that they were missiles surrounded by holograms made to look like planes', he says, which would be well beyond the capabilities of contemporaneous hologram technology.
"Watch footage frame by frame and you will see a cigar-shaped missile hitting the World Trade Center". Some truth movement veterans have repeatedly refuted the "no-plane" claims.[75][159] In fact, discussion of no-plane theories has been banned from certain conspiracy theory websites and advocates have sometimes been threatened with violence by posters at other conspiracy theory websites. [160]
Rich and satisfying is the irony in THAT. LOL!
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼