It's the absurd tendency to lazily label as conspiracies so many things that can be explained from the facts available.
There are the facts, and there is human nature that predicts a 'falling out' among conspirators the bigger the conspiracy theory.
But maybe I missed something? DID the article make the broader claim that 'conspiracies absolutely do not exist' rather than qualify by stating that there's just too damned MANY bat-shit conspiracy theories?
Quote:Conspiracies are not new and to believe they absolutely do not exist is small.