ZAMMMMM. Almost nothing was bought at .0013 on the
Post# of 4997
(Total Views: 187)
Posted On: 08/11/2017 1:37:16 PM
ZAMMMMM. Almost nothing was bought at .0013 on the July 6 > July 10 run - most late arrival iHubbers bought at .0011 and .0012. Because they have a trading mentality that is short term and are easily influenced by basher nonsense, they tend to sell for a loss if they don't see an instant run of 5>20 ticks or more.
The extent to which DIGX goes up in the .001xs depends entirely on how many of those 400M bought at .0011>.0012 in July were sold for a loss at .0010 > .0007 from July 12 onwards. I believe most were sold at a loss July 12 > July 31 as there wasn't much sign of those that considered themselves bag holders at .0010 selling at .0011 this time.
It is irrelevant to me how far $DIGX goes up in the .0011>.0020 range on the Q2 filing and again on the subsequent PR 1 to 2 days later. I'm a long term whale who can hold more shares "free" for future runs with every run that DIGX makes - several so far in 2017 alone.
That is the benefit of my trading system where you keep your cheapest batches of shares at all times - so as never to have the "shall I sell too soon and be left without shares" dilemma. You create an inventory of others to trade when you're content with the profit. You don't have to have a particular target price in mind and you just trade what the market will give you whenever high volume days occur without whacking the bid or stacking the ask.
I will have shares from above .0007 to trade - bought on the bid and ask from those that sold too soon recently - whilst still retaining my .0007s and below for future runs before and on Q3 and the Annual Report.
I don't care how much I hold up to the limit I set myself (in DIGX's case - all free) and I don't care how long it takes to get a profit.
I come back to, nobody has bought at a price in 2017 that is above the correct pps for the value of the company (increasing every Q) based on the share structure (which is also expected to decrease).
All the above is what makes $DIGX my #1 pick for repeat runs on an ongoing basis every months or so - on Qs and associated pre-runs.
After every run, the big players in DIGX (there are at least 3 recognised from posts) will bid at the all the levels that make sense to them.
The extent to which DIGX goes up in the .001xs depends entirely on how many of those 400M bought at .0011>.0012 in July were sold for a loss at .0010 > .0007 from July 12 onwards. I believe most were sold at a loss July 12 > July 31 as there wasn't much sign of those that considered themselves bag holders at .0010 selling at .0011 this time.
It is irrelevant to me how far $DIGX goes up in the .0011>.0020 range on the Q2 filing and again on the subsequent PR 1 to 2 days later. I'm a long term whale who can hold more shares "free" for future runs with every run that DIGX makes - several so far in 2017 alone.
That is the benefit of my trading system where you keep your cheapest batches of shares at all times - so as never to have the "shall I sell too soon and be left without shares" dilemma. You create an inventory of others to trade when you're content with the profit. You don't have to have a particular target price in mind and you just trade what the market will give you whenever high volume days occur without whacking the bid or stacking the ask.
I will have shares from above .0007 to trade - bought on the bid and ask from those that sold too soon recently - whilst still retaining my .0007s and below for future runs before and on Q3 and the Annual Report.
I don't care how much I hold up to the limit I set myself (in DIGX's case - all free) and I don't care how long it takes to get a profit.
I come back to, nobody has bought at a price in 2017 that is above the correct pps for the value of the company (increasing every Q) based on the share structure (which is also expected to decrease).
All the above is what makes $DIGX my #1 pick for repeat runs on an ongoing basis every months or so - on Qs and associated pre-runs.
After every run, the big players in DIGX (there are at least 3 recognised from posts) will bid at the all the levels that make sense to them.
(0)
(0)Eco Innovation Group Inc (ECOX) Stock Research Links
"Per Ardua Ad Astra" - "Through Adversity To The Stars"
A very apposite motto for those who trade successfully in the OTC market..
All posts are my opinion - trade at your own risk.
A very apposite motto for those who trade successfully in the OTC market..
All posts are my opinion - trade at your own risk.