And YOUR problem is that you repeatedly choose to
Post# of 126505
(Total Views: 201)
Posted On: 08/07/2017 2:16:01 PM
Re: wowhappens28 #1251
And YOUR problem is that you repeatedly choose to 'kill the messenger' rather than analyze the message.
Because I don't post every thing I read you have no way of knowing how much I accept or reject from the right or left, and you of course overlook how readily, unquestioningly, you accept arguments from the right and how easily you lose your shit when those arguments are countered.
Stop taking the lazy way out by raising 'biography' over the validity of the arguments advanced.
As you read, he actually singles out the 'leftist' part of the problem.
Because I don't post every thing I read you have no way of knowing how much I accept or reject from the right or left, and you of course overlook how readily, unquestioningly, you accept arguments from the right and how easily you lose your shit when those arguments are countered.
Stop taking the lazy way out by raising 'biography' over the validity of the arguments advanced.
As you read, he actually singles out the 'leftist' part of the problem.
Quote:
On one side is an army of quacks and pseudo-environmentalists waging a leftist war on science......Quote:
And the best point from either your article or mine is right down the middle:
Quote:
Pesticide vs. pesticide, technology vs. technology, risk vs. risk—it’s all relative. The best you can do is measure each practice against the alternatives. The least you can do is look past a three-letter label .
Quote:
On one side is an army of quacks and pseudo-environmentalists waging a leftist war on science. On the other side are corporate cowards who would rather stick to profitable weed-killing than invest in products that might offend a suspicious public.
The more you learn about herbicide resistance, the more you come to understand how complicated the truth about GMOs is. First you discover that they aren’t evil. Then you learn that they aren’t perfectly innocent. Then you realize that nothing is perfectly innocent.
Pesticide vs. pesticide, technology vs. technology, risk vs. risk—it’s all relative. The best you can do is measure each practice against the alternatives. The least you can do is look past a three-letter label .
(1)
(0)