Most of the complaining seems to be from the lack of honest answers. Muse seems to have had a long history of making bold predictions and targets and then just changing them after the fact like the buyback, PPS, EIA, reconstruction, and then the no bid scenario. Blame is always shifted to SI, FR, Bill, and so on while they claimed they were only passing on information. I do not remember a proxy going out to shareholders asking us to vote on reconstruction so how did we commit to endure it? A lot of honest questions have been asked with no honest answers. With all of those preferred waiting to convert and revenues still down the road, how did James or anyone else touting the year end penny price target think the price could possibly achieve that level? Let's start with that one.
(1)
(0)
Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links