Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Message Board

We were introduced to AVIC in 2009, not 2007. We'r

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (2)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 425)
Posted On: 08/03/2017 9:03:15 AM
Posted By: wrmckay
Re: kmmohr1960 #19488
We were introduced to AVIC in 2009, not 2007. We're introduced to Pinnacle Energy, the prior name for TPAC in late 2009, not 2007. We concluded the deal in 2010. That's when I took over the company and we changed the name.

Speaking "apple to apple" there is a facility. There is a difference between book value and actual value. A company can have a machine with a 7 year life for depreciation purposes. At the end of that 7 years, that machine has no book value. However it still exists. It doesn't disappear. If the company sells that machine, the company recognizes a gain on the sale. So we have a facility, a physical shop, with real machines and real equipment. We have the ability to make bearings at this exact moment in time. The only thing is that the assets have no book value, but they do exist. Since you like to be clear, let's be clear in what the filings say. Each of the filings since 2011 have and continue to clearly say that we have a facility in which to make bearings. We have no filings that state that we do not have a working facility producing bearings, in fact quite the opposite is true. The filings consistently state we have a facility.

I know that the language in the filings can be confusing but rest assured that we have a facility and machinery and equipment and tooling and blueprints and raw material, and intellectual property, all of which, although they have no book value, do have actual value and can be used to produce bearings.


(6)
(1)




Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  






Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us