MY FIVE BIG REASONS FOR HOLDING BVTK LONG AND STRO
Post# of 913
1. First and foremost is the credibility and integrity of the CEO. The only people who have anything bad to say about this guy are stock cheats and scam artists who profit on that sort of thing. But my research on him, and I have done at least 20 hours purely on HIM, reveals a man of very high character and incredible accomplishment. Let's list a few of his positions and resume' blockbusters: https://www.facebook.com/groups/bvtkstockfanp...351372017/
2. The Product and Services potential for very large contract and partnership opportunities. The PATENT PENDING Ecrypt technology and platform fills a gap in the cyber security space. It seems to play very well with other platforms and with other e-security platforms being pushed out (think Kasperskey), Ecrypt has huge potential and is ALREADY being run as a trial by multiple Fortune 2000 firms. With Tom (and team) having such deep government ties, of which they have been working very hard to develop into contract opportunities, it only makes sense that Ecrypt will eventually see at least some agencies come fully on board. We don't need them all. One or two will be more than enough. But Ecrypt only represents a piece of the future revenue for BVTK. The 5G tower design/build/service contracts presents us with a massive "first to market" opportunity in an emerging space. I believe this is where BVTK will shine very brightly over the next 10 years. This is a space where their strategic partnerships will prove invaluable. The revenue opportunity here is truly unimaginable. And the demand is extremely high. With Tom's proven history as the Chief Commercialization Officer for DHS, I know that he knows exactly how to bring this opportunity to fruition. We have already seen him putting the teams in place and preparing for the capital demands of tower design/install/service business. IMO, the revenue potential for BVTK is only limited by the CEO's ability to team and manage opportunity. And that happens to be what he is best at; identifying opportunity, bringing in the team, getting results. Which leads me to #3.....
3. THE "C" TEAM: I would call them the "A" team but since it's Cellucci's experience and integrity that will attract this top shelf players, let's just call them The "C" Team.
Chuck Brooks - legendary Information Technology player named Cybersecurity Marketer of the Year two years in a row (16/17). More here: https://itspmagazine.com/meet-the-experts/chuck-brooks/
Jim Brown - VP Sales...this guy comes with a reputation for taking big ideas and building large national sales teams and turning them into revenue producing monsters. At Comcast he took them from 300K in his first year to over one BILLION in sales by year 6. He has walked the walk and that is more than 99.999% of OTC business development managers can say. Like Tom, Jim's resume' is incredibly impressive. https://finance.yahoo.com/…/bravatek-brings...-sales-…
Debbie King - CFO - Ms. King has vast amount of business experience in the startup, acquisition, expansion and reorganization phases of organizations. Her diverse skill set and educational background provides a broad perspective of financial and operational business management. Ms. King’s background as an Accountant has served numerous of firms in various industries in optimizing profit outputs and streamlining business practices. She is a strong minded and focused individual that utilizes her education and experience to assist in analyzing, identifying and implementing operational changes to increase efficiency and profits. Ms. King possesses expansive understanding of financial, legal and business tax applications. Ms. King has been a Director of Ecrypt Technologies, Inc since March 16, 2015. Her experience is a perfect fit for BVTK.
Ian Treleaven- VP Software: Ian's background is one of the most exciting. Engineer at Microsoft? Check. Designed Enterprise class software? Check. Been primarily responsible for ensuring that software performed and did everything they were supposed to do for large software firms? Check. Read for yourself. This guy is legendary like the rest of the team: http://bravatek.com/person/ian-treleaven-2/
Hans Holmer - Director: You probably don't want an ex CIA officer living next door to you because they probably would know every detail about everything you have ever done. But if you had a cyber technology firm that was responsible for knowing common methods for hacking nation states and corporations, you would absolutely want one there. That is Hans Holmer. Read more: http://bravatek.com/person/hans-holmer/
I PERSONALLY BELIEVE THAT LEADERSHIP IS THE KEY TO THE SUCCESS OF ANY COMPANY. BUT ALL THAT MUCH MORE VITAL TO MICRO CAPS CLAIMING TO HAVE A PLAN FOR ADDING SHAREHOLDER VALUE. THIS TEAM IS PROBABLY THE NUMBER ONE REASON WHY I LOVE THIS COMPANY. THOMAS CELLUCCI WILL CONTINUE TO ATTRACT THIS CALIBER OF LEADER AS BVTK GROWS IN THE COMING MONTHS.
4. Upcoming financials imminent/Stop sign removal/New deal PR’s forthcoming: Some have stated that the leadership has failed to deliver on some of their promises in this regard. I believe that can be chalked up to investors reading into things like “be on the lookout for PR” and believing if it doesn’t come out within 2 or 3 days, the CEO was misleading people. I think that is ridiculous. Having owned several medium sized small businesses, there is how fast we WANT business to happen and then there is REALITY. Sometimes the two don’t work on the same timelines. I have been incredibly pleased with how this leadership team has communicated with shareholders. Like everyone, I want every PR and every report and required filing to happen RIGHT NOW. But this is not reality. Couple the speed of business with the reality that everything should NOT come out immediately if the CEO is trying to add maximum shareholder value. A strategy must be developed and followed, leaving room for the ebb and flow of business. I would much rather wait on some of these reports if, by waiting, we can see a more managed and strategic release of this information that will drive price-per-share up. I laugh when I see investors express anger that we had a red day and the CEO didn’t put out a PR to “save the day”. That is so short-sided that its just not worth talking about further.
5. Share Buy Back And/Or Plan to Get us to NASDAQ: How many CEO’s in the OTC can say that they have run companies traded on the “big boards”? VERY FEW. Thomas Cellucci has done so…very successfully. He knows the ins and outs of driving shareholder value and maintaining shareholder value so as to meet the requirements of the board they are traded on. So when TC says that he has a plan to get us to NASDAQ without a reverse split, I believe him. But only because of his background and history and proven integrity. I could see every OTC CEO saying that, but only TC has that experience. Speaking of a reverse split. Much has been made about the possibility of this. And for good reason. Most companies with our bloated share structure will do a RS in order to reduce shares and drive price-per-share up. But that does NOT mean that EVERY company MUST do a reverse split as they grow. Tom has stated that he has a plan to reduce shares, get to NASDAQ without a RS. When confronted about the rumors of a RS, he sent a Facebook group member an email that stated simply “Bullshit”. At this point, this part of my reasoning is pure speculation. As part of that, I have to ask myself “what happens if he does do a reverse split in order to get us to $4 pps?” So let’s say he does a 2/1 reverse split and the 6.8 billion gets reduced to 3.4 billion and my 2 million shares gets reduced to 1 million shares. BUT WE GO TO 4 BUCKS. That means my 1 million shares have a $4,000,000 value. Thank you Tom. Thank you very much.
There are many upcoming catalysts that we could talk about that others here are doing a great job breaking down and analyzing.