If what you are saying is true then, that should h
Post# of 15624
(Total Views: 323)
Posted On: 07/31/2017 5:23:43 PM
Re: GreenMachine84 #10166
If what you are saying is true then, that should have been the answer!
This is one of the initial replies that I got:
Given that ClinicalTrials.gov is a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health I had assumed that this study was to have been conducted in the states. This is something that I asked to be clarified. To say the least it created a lot of confusion. Even Jeffrey Friedland seemed puzzled and didn't know anything about it.
Again, this proves my point that rather than speculate that it's because it's meant to protect their IP or this or that, why not send an email and see if you can get a straight answer? After all this is not a rumour that started on iHub, it's on an official site. It should have been a simple answer to a simple question. I know they are not that dense so it makes you wonder why they can't answer a simple fucking question without getting defensive about it.
This is one of the initial replies that I got:
Quote:
Hi, First , thanks for the support
Second , Just to be accurate :
The company did not announce the start of the study on February .
We announced that we received IRB approval to conduct the study.
The link, it is a federal link and might not be up to date
After we received the approval , together with the hospital we recruited all the patients which mean the study is not open for free volunteers and , I guess , this what the link means .
Given that ClinicalTrials.gov is a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health I had assumed that this study was to have been conducted in the states. This is something that I asked to be clarified. To say the least it created a lot of confusion. Even Jeffrey Friedland seemed puzzled and didn't know anything about it.
Again, this proves my point that rather than speculate that it's because it's meant to protect their IP or this or that, why not send an email and see if you can get a straight answer? After all this is not a rumour that started on iHub, it's on an official site. It should have been a simple answer to a simple question. I know they are not that dense so it makes you wonder why they can't answer a simple fucking question without getting defensive about it.
(1)
(0)