you really need to do better DD .. i first posted on my NSS board in July 2015
that the dance of the algos (this ain't retail *charlie*) was about to break wide
open on CTIX .. Alan is a regular on my NSS board and i suspect that very
detailed post i did *there* caught his attn .. but since one of the embedded
crews' stalks *daily* .. it also caught the attn of another .. who showed
up *shortly* afterward on the vehicle of choice for OTC stock manipulation
to become a *regular* .. that would be sunspotter ..
.. who joined others
*entrenched* .. there .. like i've noted previously the overlapping tentacles
of crews is easily ascertained .. of course easily may be relative .. because
it requires 100s of hours of *reading* .. and one has to be willing to go back years
what i find truly remarkable is the effort in play to divert and deflect and *project*
re: this info .. it has always *threatened* a certain segment .. hmmm
go back 6 years or more and read any post by certain *aliases* and note what
has never changed for those who *invest* vs those who flip depending on
if out or in .. or those crews' working cycles of money or those *trolls* who
literally spend every post *there* and have never found a company worth
*investing* in .. rather they just have taken root
i come back to basics .. ask yourself .. who spends any time on a SMB they don't
*personally* have a financial interest in ..
4kids
that the dance of the algos (this ain't retail *charlie*) was about to break wide
open on CTIX .. Alan is a regular on my NSS board and i suspect that very
detailed post i did *there* caught his attn .. but since one of the embedded
crews' stalks *daily* .. it also caught the attn of another .. who showed
up *shortly* afterward on the vehicle of choice for OTC stock manipulation
to become a *regular* .. that would be sunspotter ..
.. who joined others *entrenched* .. there .. like i've noted previously the overlapping tentacles
of crews is easily ascertained .. of course easily may be relative .. because
it requires 100s of hours of *reading* .. and one has to be willing to go back years
what i find truly remarkable is the effort in play to divert and deflect and *project*
re: this info .. it has always *threatened* a certain segment .. hmmm
go back 6 years or more and read any post by certain *aliases* and note what
has never changed for those who *invest* vs those who flip depending on
if out or in .. or those crews' working cycles of money or those *trolls* who
literally spend every post *there* and have never found a company worth
*investing* in .. rather they just have taken root
i come back to basics .. ask yourself .. who spends any time on a SMB they don't
*personally* have a financial interest in ..
4kids
Quote:Just stating facts, not innuendo. Your very FIRST post about CTIX was your typical Finra numbers post with CTIX being 60% short that day. Not one good word to say about the company. CTIX was $3.55 that day. Question, why would you invest in a $ 3.55 stock that was being illegally shorted at 60%. Especially when you know those shorting never have to cover. You stated you only post FINRA numbers in companies you are invested.
Fact, MAKO immediately shows up within days of your post with their first hit piece on CTIX. Two years later your still posting daily fake short numbers and MAKO is still producing fake hit pieces on the company.
Coincidence or not, it is still a fact. It also could be incredibly bad timing on your part.
Hopefully IPIX gets the financial security to end the bullsh!t and you can move on and scare the investors at another company with your short numbers.
4
