great email from last September.....stew on this for a minute...or two.....
Greetings TPAC Shareholders,
First, let’s give you a new conscious thought; hold what you know about PPS.
Ready your mind to this...Everyone knows retained earnings/cash-on-hand is the key to a stable stock.
Let’s start with the mindset……. a reverse split isn't going to happen but a buy back may not happen either.
You’re probably saying to yourselves, "this is just crazy".
Here Me Out…
One of the chief reasons TPAC hasn’t taken the $10M loan is because at some point they can use $85M to increase its IPPS.
Remember, TPAC is not the same company of 2014/ 2015; it has drastically changed in 2016.
TPACs moved from manufacturer to service provider with two distinct lines of service.
What does that has to do with the IPPS?
If you take the $85M loan and have nothing else to do with it…it can be placed at the floor….cash-on-hand.
Shareholders were provided this outlook and IPPS formula in the beginning: Retained earnings - Dividends/Outstanding Shares. There are no dividends so let’s run the numbers.
$85M from loan moves to MRVB as cash-on-hand; Retained Earning/Total OS (4B rounded up just for easy calculations) = .021 (this is before any share reduction ). Just based on the loan becoming cash-on-hand, the IPPS value goes sky-high.
The 52 week high is .0072. The loan can automatically propel the stock price pass the 52 week high……
TPAC is looking at things in a different light.
So just with the full loan from EX IM, TPAC could carry out this. Maybe an EIA’s retained earnings in a calendar year can trigger it…note the word “TRIGGER”.
The difference of 90 days ago….the loan was to be used to acquire facilities and increase manufacturing output; today all that has changed through Service Level Agreements and Licensing Agreements. TPAC doesn’t have those prior needs.
TPAC DOESN’T HAVE THE SAME FINANCIAL NEEDS AND IT DOESN’T HAVE DEBT.
TPAC can channel its money elsewhere……. no better place than an MRVB as cash-on-hand. TPAC would never have to do any other business and it would grow just off interest, which is REVENUE.
Add the MRVB and BTL, as long as they are in effect, the IPPS grows AUTOMATICALLY.
TPAC won’t express more information on the teams, just come to know TPAC has an A-TEAM. Their financial backgrounds in WALLSTREET and experiences in GLOBAL MARKETS & MARKETINGare bringing a NEW twist to TPAC.
The teams’ goal is to build stability creating self-adjusting self-regenerating systems that allow TPAC to become a prime business in the global landscape.
The company is the key.
Build the company the stock will follow, not the other way around.
This is the best way to raise the IPPS without taking from the Shareholder. These teams are business builders providing CEO Bill McKay with top methodologies that you won’t find in other OTC businesses.
Thanks to CEO Bill McKay, his company framework makes it easier to implement changes at a rapid pace.
If you have any other questions let me know.
No Market Maker can manipulate IPPS.
--James
IR Manager
Greetings TPAC Shareholders,
First, let’s give you a new conscious thought; hold what you know about PPS.
Ready your mind to this...Everyone knows retained earnings/cash-on-hand is the key to a stable stock.
Let’s start with the mindset……. a reverse split isn't going to happen but a buy back may not happen either.
You’re probably saying to yourselves, "this is just crazy".
Here Me Out…
One of the chief reasons TPAC hasn’t taken the $10M loan is because at some point they can use $85M to increase its IPPS.
Remember, TPAC is not the same company of 2014/ 2015; it has drastically changed in 2016.
TPACs moved from manufacturer to service provider with two distinct lines of service.
What does that has to do with the IPPS?
If you take the $85M loan and have nothing else to do with it…it can be placed at the floor….cash-on-hand.
Shareholders were provided this outlook and IPPS formula in the beginning: Retained earnings - Dividends/Outstanding Shares. There are no dividends so let’s run the numbers.
$85M from loan moves to MRVB as cash-on-hand; Retained Earning/Total OS (4B rounded up just for easy calculations) = .021 (this is before any share reduction ). Just based on the loan becoming cash-on-hand, the IPPS value goes sky-high.
The 52 week high is .0072. The loan can automatically propel the stock price pass the 52 week high……
TPAC is looking at things in a different light.
So just with the full loan from EX IM, TPAC could carry out this. Maybe an EIA’s retained earnings in a calendar year can trigger it…note the word “TRIGGER”.
The difference of 90 days ago….the loan was to be used to acquire facilities and increase manufacturing output; today all that has changed through Service Level Agreements and Licensing Agreements. TPAC doesn’t have those prior needs.
TPAC DOESN’T HAVE THE SAME FINANCIAL NEEDS AND IT DOESN’T HAVE DEBT.
TPAC can channel its money elsewhere……. no better place than an MRVB as cash-on-hand. TPAC would never have to do any other business and it would grow just off interest, which is REVENUE.
Add the MRVB and BTL, as long as they are in effect, the IPPS grows AUTOMATICALLY.
TPAC won’t express more information on the teams, just come to know TPAC has an A-TEAM. Their financial backgrounds in WALLSTREET and experiences in GLOBAL MARKETS & MARKETINGare bringing a NEW twist to TPAC.
The teams’ goal is to build stability creating self-adjusting self-regenerating systems that allow TPAC to become a prime business in the global landscape.
The company is the key.
Build the company the stock will follow, not the other way around.
This is the best way to raise the IPPS without taking from the Shareholder. These teams are business builders providing CEO Bill McKay with top methodologies that you won’t find in other OTC businesses.
Thanks to CEO Bill McKay, his company framework makes it easier to implement changes at a rapid pace.
If you have any other questions let me know.
No Market Maker can manipulate IPPS.
--James
IR Manager
3
