Rags, I haven't kept up with this board so if there is past garbage I'm unaware or perhaps that may answer me now. But reading the board the past two days I'm simply appalled at what you have said. To have a healthy TPAC conversation we need varying opinions - of course no personal attacks or company bashing. Interpretations, insights and anticipations should be accepted from all angles. Sounds more like you want to foster a snowflake tpac board. Unacceptable. For example - If someone feels tpac moving forward with these bikes is a mistake than they have a right to say so. Others can then post why that person may be wrong.
I for one am annoyed with bill right now. I asked straight forward in front of all of you for the business plan. He said nothing. It has been "unavailable" on the official investors communication site (tpac web site). And then someone here posted its on ARC ?? Which not all investors are on (myself included). unacceptable.
(8)
(1)
Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links