thats dishonest- as i told you this is the legisla
Post# of 123788
The rules by which men carry out that LEGISLATIVE INTENTdo not have to read like a theology textbook because the legislative intent behind those rules and which informs those rules has ALREADY been ESTABLISHED.
we didnt even read the declaration or the constitution at any time during law school because the aba had already rejected the faith of the founding fathers and the constitution they wrote.
As per scores of millions of american christians, that began june 29 1962 when the courts began their attacks on 250 years of american christianity. Thus the million person washington DC Christian gathering called the call 2002 set for ca 40 years after that event was as per the xtian leader who organized it-cindy jacobs and husband- changed to the anniversary of that court decision which began removing the bible from the schools
Had the constitution changed? No -but the judges rejected the faith of the previous generations as a spearhead to destroy the protections which had made america the strongest empire in the world so that the next time a hitler arose america would not stop him -that was the adversaries plan.
by the time ORU established a xtian law school in 1979 ORU had to spend 1 million/year to fight off aba attempts to destroy the law school-so ORU was forced to transfer the law school to Pat Robersons regent university-since Pat had the political and legal clout to withstand the attacks by the aba.
the secular humanist head of the county bar where i lived agreed w this assessment of the legal system in our discussions even though he was a byproduct of that demonic legal teaching.