You misunderstood my post. The SEC is describing t
Post# of 72440
(Total Views: 180)
Posted On: 07/09/2017 7:27:09 PM
You misunderstood my post. The SEC is describing the usual behaviors of someone who claims there's a large naked position. One of them is claiming they'll be forced to cover as the stock goes up.
Your fidelity example assumes 100% sells and 0% buys, which can't be true.
Most of you know I'm a facts guy. All I'm asking is to provide the FINRA short volume data as is. A link to the daily file is even better. There's no need to add the short sales % line. I think Drano has requested something similar but you turned it down.
Do you think the SEC's failure-to-deliver number is credible?
Your fidelity example assumes 100% sells and 0% buys, which can't be true.
Most of you know I'm a facts guy. All I'm asking is to provide the FINRA short volume data as is. A link to the daily file is even better. There's no need to add the short sales % line. I think Drano has requested something similar but you turned it down.
Do you think the SEC's failure-to-deliver number is credible?
(1)
(0)Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼