Device accuracy questioned and respective response
Post# of 1481
Quote:- We detect the Total Canna Profile (TCP) of each sample tested (which consists of Cannabinoids, Terpenes, Flavinoids, and any other chemical that might generate a sensor response on our proprietary 16 channel sensors)
- Each Strain typically generates a unique TCP (fingerprint) which consumers can then associate with a Feeling or Ailment Relief they experienced with that sample, and save it so they can track which chemical profile is working for them.
- Our Proprietary Algorithms are capable of interpreting this sensor response to predict a feeling or ailment relief based on crowdsourced data, as well as provide a prediction of the Cannabinoid and Terpene Values based on our Lab Tested Reference Database.
Read our White Paper for more details. https://www.cdxlife.com/mydx-white-paper/
He also added:
Quote:- Also note we are the only handheld chemical tester that can test for Terpenes that I am aware of. There are other testers out there which cost upwards of $20-30K (Sage Analytics, Orange Photonics, QuantaCann, etc) that can test Cannabinoids only and claim to be more accurate that our device, but they are larger bench top machines and no one has ever definitively confirmed that for me via scientific proof their accuracy.
- We are very well positioned as an affordable primary screening device. If you want perfect accuracy, then you can spend $50K to buy a lab machine and hire a technician full time to run a test and hope to achieve that, or send it into a certified lab as of January 2018 and pay $400/test, assuming you can find a lab that can guarantee their accuracy.