Let me try a different approach and see if it make

Let me try a different approach and see if it makes sense to all.
It is my contention that all shares of IPIX are owned by investors and have been for some time. It is also my contention that Mako was hired to write a hit piece by those that are short to try and scare investors into selling their holdings because those short were in trouble and the same goes for the Rosen class action. The company stood up to these attacks and as a result those attacks failed badly leaving those short with a growing problem. Growing because the company continued to produce good results on its 3 drug platforms. Now I think we all agree that for every share purchased a share must also be sold. My contention is longs continued to accumulate. I know my holdings increased 25 fold and while perhaps my increase was not typical I can honestly say I know no investor that sold but I know many that bought. Aspire and Arruda are not selling the number of shares being purchased according to the filings. It is my contention that the shorts have continued selling us shares they don't own all these many months and they have done this while walking down the price because they can. They can control the price today but they cannot control the science and once news breaks on our science and whom we are collaberating with it will spread like wildfire and those short will be helpless to control the price. Until then we are able to continue to accumulate shares at manipulated prices. As 4kids points out Leo has lots of options once a deal is inked and I am confidant Leo has a plan of action in place that he intends to follow. Go IPIX!!!
PS It is also my contention that the FINRA short volume I have been reporting daily is very close to the total real volume traded. The difference between the short volume and the total volume being wash sales used to simulate selling, walk down the price and lower the FINRA short percentage at the end of the day.