On iHub, rogue Mod "munimi" has been removed from his post after an overwhelming case was built against him. iHub clearly did some late damage limitation after a few serious traders in the OTC mentioned - both on iHub and on social media - that his activities were worthy of investigation by the SEC .
He posted deliberately misleading information about the stock consistently for 30 days and failed to desist even when proved incorrect by actual trading in the market.
He - in consort with "surfkast" and "Full Contact Yoga" - repeatedly made potentially libellous statements about the company and its' officers.
He misused his Moderator position by leaving a deliberately misleading sticky post in place for 30 days - even when proved incorrect on all counts by actual trading in the market. He ignored requests to remove it.
He misused his position by repeatedly reinstating posts that had been deleted by other Mods and by repeatedly deleting posts that had been restored by other Mods.
A number of significant traders in the OTC market have indicated that they are able to provide evidence to the SEC if required.
Ironically, if he was bid sitting unrealistically, he will not have benefitted from his attempts to dupe others into selling. He will have been outsmarted by the whale traders who were happy to hit the ask at .0004 and .0005 to deny any significant bid fills to the likes of him and other low level flippers.
As it is now likely that longs control a significant % of the low float (less than needs to be reported), and because they will keep these to trade sensibly on multiple future runs (that is my plan and the plan of those who follow my long strategy), that is probably why we are seeing such small asks on each uptick to .0005 and .0006 compared to the amount bought at the price below.
Clearly some of the short term traders who rely on iHub as their primary source of information will have sold for a loss at .0004 or .0003 if they were duped by "munimi" and the other notorious, well-known repeat bashers om iHub. Hopefully they will be able to recoup their losses by buying back in at .0006 or .0007 before the next run. As stated previously, nobody has bought $DIGX in 2016 or 2017 at a price that it should not go past at some point in the future if it is to reach its' market cap equivalent price.
He posted deliberately misleading information about the stock consistently for 30 days and failed to desist even when proved incorrect by actual trading in the market.
He - in consort with "surfkast" and "Full Contact Yoga" - repeatedly made potentially libellous statements about the company and its' officers.
He misused his Moderator position by leaving a deliberately misleading sticky post in place for 30 days - even when proved incorrect on all counts by actual trading in the market. He ignored requests to remove it.
He misused his position by repeatedly reinstating posts that had been deleted by other Mods and by repeatedly deleting posts that had been restored by other Mods.
A number of significant traders in the OTC market have indicated that they are able to provide evidence to the SEC if required.
Ironically, if he was bid sitting unrealistically, he will not have benefitted from his attempts to dupe others into selling. He will have been outsmarted by the whale traders who were happy to hit the ask at .0004 and .0005 to deny any significant bid fills to the likes of him and other low level flippers.
As it is now likely that longs control a significant % of the low float (less than needs to be reported), and because they will keep these to trade sensibly on multiple future runs (that is my plan and the plan of those who follow my long strategy), that is probably why we are seeing such small asks on each uptick to .0005 and .0006 compared to the amount bought at the price below.
Clearly some of the short term traders who rely on iHub as their primary source of information will have sold for a loss at .0004 or .0003 if they were duped by "munimi" and the other notorious, well-known repeat bashers om iHub. Hopefully they will be able to recoup their losses by buying back in at .0006 or .0007 before the next run. As stated previously, nobody has bought $DIGX in 2016 or 2017 at a price that it should not go past at some point in the future if it is to reach its' market cap equivalent price.
1
American EcoFuels Inc (AEFI) Stock Research Links
"Per Ardua Ad Astra" - "Through Adversity To The Stars"
A very apposite motto for those who trade successfully in the OTC market..
All posts are my opinion - trade at your own risk.
A very apposite motto for those who trade successfully in the OTC market..
All posts are my opinion - trade at your own risk.
