The poster never said "YOU should". The poster sai
Post# of 96892
(Total Views: 641)
Posted On: 06/24/2017 10:17:10 AM
The poster never said "YOU should". The poster said "I would". Nobody forced you to take advice from this poster, this poster is only sharing what they would do if they were disgruntled.
This is a long post. I am writing it here as a response to your post because you specifically said "Posters who aggressively support this stock should".
I am going to address what "posters should" and should not do.
I want to be clear, this forum is for NTEK investors who support their investment. I have noticed that the specific posters who are "soft bashing" also have a history of not supporting the stock. I realize that the term "soft bashing" can be defined in many ways, so let me clarify.
The definition of soft is a subtle effect of contrast.
The definition of bashing is severe criticism.
So the term soft basher is defined as one who is subtle about their severe criticism.
While looking through certain posters history, I have noticed that the quality of their posts do not communicate any form of due diligence. Mostly, these posts are more emotional than logical while simultaneously trolling shareholders or trolling the optimistic shareholder sentiment.
The site terms are very clear.
If you do not like the optimism of a shareholders post, you can go to their profile and select "ignore this user".
This forum is place for people to post due diligence and SUPPORT their investment by sharing their due diligence. Optimism is welcomed, pessimism is not. If a post is negative and elicits an angry response, it will be deleted.
Moderators are going to stop guessing who is a "soft basher" and who is not.
This is a long post. I am writing it here as a response to your post because you specifically said "Posters who aggressively support this stock should".
I am going to address what "posters should" and should not do.
I want to be clear, this forum is for NTEK investors who support their investment. I have noticed that the specific posters who are "soft bashing" also have a history of not supporting the stock. I realize that the term "soft bashing" can be defined in many ways, so let me clarify.
The definition of soft is a subtle effect of contrast.
The definition of bashing is severe criticism.
So the term soft basher is defined as one who is subtle about their severe criticism.
While looking through certain posters history, I have noticed that the quality of their posts do not communicate any form of due diligence. Mostly, these posts are more emotional than logical while simultaneously trolling shareholders or trolling the optimistic shareholder sentiment.
The site terms are very clear.
Quote:
- No trolling (posting an obviously negative post/thread to elicit an angry response).
If you do not like the optimism of a shareholders post, you can go to their profile and select "ignore this user".
This forum is place for people to post due diligence and SUPPORT their investment by sharing their due diligence. Optimism is welcomed, pessimism is not. If a post is negative and elicits an angry response, it will be deleted.
Moderators are going to stop guessing who is a "soft basher" and who is not.
(20)
(5)