Sorry you took my post in that light. I am fu
Post# of 72447
(Total Views: 343)
Posted On: 06/22/2017 9:35:49 AM
Sorry you took my post in that light.
I am fully in, have no fears regarding our science, and expect the stock price to reflect same by end of the year.
As to stock price rising immediately after July10 report, my experience in start ups where shorts and professional shady traders can manipulate price, leads me to believe we could see some stock movement totally alien to how we think it should move based on the positive news. I say this from experience, not trying to make up FUD.
Also, I do change opinions from time to time and don't mind sharing them so I am not a one mantra poster. My 2nd half 2017 expectations are as high as anybody's on this board.
I know that positive news will only reinforce my long term expectations but I also believe the share price may not react as most expect until a partnership is announced, regardless of the quality of news regarding trials (both interim and top line reports) issued prior to such partnership.
My mind works like throwing SH** against a wall. I say what comes across without screening what I said weeks ago to keep a consistent story. Sorry, that's just me.
Question my posts, I do sometimes when I re-read them, but my motives are nothing more than to spur conversation.
Look at the question I asked, it should be able to be answered by everyone on this board, yet so far next to zip/zilch/nada replies. Is this what we really want this board to be or do you want to hear opinions from those that have a common interest in seeing IPI succeed? IMO, the more input from all members of the board is imperative and if someone isn't posting, then why should he be allowed here? Make a contribution, even if it is sketchy, but that is better than having a bunch of dead wood just sitting on their asses saying nothing.
I realize I don't have a lot of medical knowledge to bring to the board so my role IMO is to try and spur conversation.
I am not angry or upset at your reply, quite the contrary, but just wanted you and the board to know where I stand on issues.
I am fully in, have no fears regarding our science, and expect the stock price to reflect same by end of the year.
As to stock price rising immediately after July10 report, my experience in start ups where shorts and professional shady traders can manipulate price, leads me to believe we could see some stock movement totally alien to how we think it should move based on the positive news. I say this from experience, not trying to make up FUD.
Also, I do change opinions from time to time and don't mind sharing them so I am not a one mantra poster. My 2nd half 2017 expectations are as high as anybody's on this board.
I know that positive news will only reinforce my long term expectations but I also believe the share price may not react as most expect until a partnership is announced, regardless of the quality of news regarding trials (both interim and top line reports) issued prior to such partnership.
My mind works like throwing SH** against a wall. I say what comes across without screening what I said weeks ago to keep a consistent story. Sorry, that's just me.
Question my posts, I do sometimes when I re-read them, but my motives are nothing more than to spur conversation.
Look at the question I asked, it should be able to be answered by everyone on this board, yet so far next to zip/zilch/nada replies. Is this what we really want this board to be or do you want to hear opinions from those that have a common interest in seeing IPI succeed? IMO, the more input from all members of the board is imperative and if someone isn't posting, then why should he be allowed here? Make a contribution, even if it is sketchy, but that is better than having a bunch of dead wood just sitting on their asses saying nothing.
I realize I don't have a lot of medical knowledge to bring to the board so my role IMO is to try and spur conversation.
I am not angry or upset at your reply, quite the contrary, but just wanted you and the board to know where I stand on issues.
(4)
(0)