Tell the truth...? Where did I lie Bill? From P
Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 1278)
Posted On: 06/13/2017 11:27:13 AM
Tell the truth...? Where did I lie Bill?
From PR dated 12/12/16:
Trans-Pacific Aerospace Company - 2016 Revenue Rises
Accesswire AccesswireDecember 12, 2016
SAN MARINO, CA / ACCESSWIRE / December 12, 2016 / Trans-Pacific Aerospace Company (OTC PINK: TPAC) completes Financial Trials of its new Asset Acquisition System (AAS) with overwhelming success. TPAC stands to receive $2M in investment by new investors requesting access to the AAS. TPAC is the first OTC equity to design, implement, manage, and secure a financial platform using Alternative Financial Solutions methodologies and technologies with an AAS as its engine...
CONTACT
Corporate: www.tpacbearings.com
New Investors: Please contact IR here.
Investor Relations: ir@tpacbearings.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TPACmuse
YouTube Channel: TPACmuse Global MRVB
That is ONE quick example of James/IR being listed as the "IR" contact with the company domain. The same person/group that continually provided the $0.01 PPS target for year end 2016 AND repeatedly claimed in a company CC that the $135MM SLA with BTL was "guaranteed."
Once again - you refuse to clear these items up. You claim I have lied (no proof/examples) and I just gave you one example from your statement above.
"And for the record, the IR firm does not use our domain. tpacbearings.com is the property of and used by TPAC and I don't recall TPAC press releases listing them as our IR firm. But here I go cherry picking"
My opinion is the "company " was "pumping" on those occasions and I specifically provided the reasons (substantiation) why I thought so. An opinion cant be a lie. It can be misguided, uninformed, poorly constructed, or predicated on lies but it cant be a lie. I have given you several opportunities (privately and now publicly) to clear up the foundations for those opinions but again you deffered and went back to name calling.
Keep it short? Is that for the day traders who cant bother with DD and want quick flips?
From PR dated 12/12/16:
Trans-Pacific Aerospace Company - 2016 Revenue Rises
Accesswire AccesswireDecember 12, 2016
SAN MARINO, CA / ACCESSWIRE / December 12, 2016 / Trans-Pacific Aerospace Company (OTC PINK: TPAC) completes Financial Trials of its new Asset Acquisition System (AAS) with overwhelming success. TPAC stands to receive $2M in investment by new investors requesting access to the AAS. TPAC is the first OTC equity to design, implement, manage, and secure a financial platform using Alternative Financial Solutions methodologies and technologies with an AAS as its engine...
CONTACT
Corporate: www.tpacbearings.com
New Investors: Please contact IR here.
Investor Relations: ir@tpacbearings.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TPACmuse
YouTube Channel: TPACmuse Global MRVB
That is ONE quick example of James/IR being listed as the "IR" contact with the company domain. The same person/group that continually provided the $0.01 PPS target for year end 2016 AND repeatedly claimed in a company CC that the $135MM SLA with BTL was "guaranteed."
Once again - you refuse to clear these items up. You claim I have lied (no proof/examples) and I just gave you one example from your statement above.
"And for the record, the IR firm does not use our domain. tpacbearings.com is the property of and used by TPAC and I don't recall TPAC press releases listing them as our IR firm. But here I go cherry picking"
My opinion is the "company " was "pumping" on those occasions and I specifically provided the reasons (substantiation) why I thought so. An opinion cant be a lie. It can be misguided, uninformed, poorly constructed, or predicated on lies but it cant be a lie. I have given you several opportunities (privately and now publicly) to clear up the foundations for those opinions but again you deffered and went back to name calling.
Keep it short? Is that for the day traders who cant bother with DD and want quick flips?
(0)
(1)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼