nice looks like Comey is the one that could be in
Post# of 51876
(Total Views: 144)
Posted On: 06/09/2017 7:48:09 PM
nice looks like Comey is the one that could be in trouble now.
Comey Leaked His Memo
Obstruction aside, one of the more stunning moments during the hearing came when Comey confessed that he deliberately leaked to “a friend” the contents of the memo memorializing his conversation with Trump… so that it would then be leaked to the media. Comey said it was his personal property. Wrong.
Under the Federal Records Act and the FBI’s own Records Management regulations, “any document that is made in the course of business” is the property not of the person who authored it, but the property of the U.S. government. And so are its contents. It matters not whether the document, as this one, is unclassified.
Comey improperly and, perhaps, unlawfully leaked a government document involving an FBI investigation. Comey admitted he did it to prompt the appointment of a special counsel who is now tasked with examining Russia’s interference in the presidential election. At the very least, Comey violated government rules by converting government property for his own use. It does not matter, legally, that he was no longer employed by the FBI. Is it a crime?
Under 18 USC 793 (“Leaking Non-Classified Information”), it is a crime punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment to “willfully communicate or transmit national defense information,” even though it is not classified. While the contents of the memo do not deal directly with national defense matters, the overall investigation does. So it is debatable whether Comey could be charged.
this came out of hots posted article
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4597480
here is what was said about comey
Quote:
While the contents of the memo do not deal directly with national defense matters , the overall investigation does . So it is debatable whether Comey could be charged.
now here is the section of law being referenced in the proceedings because the overall investigation dose have to do with national defense.
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-tit...sec793.pdf
Comey Leaked His Memo
Obstruction aside, one of the more stunning moments during the hearing came when Comey confessed that he deliberately leaked to “a friend” the contents of the memo memorializing his conversation with Trump… so that it would then be leaked to the media. Comey said it was his personal property. Wrong.
Under the Federal Records Act and the FBI’s own Records Management regulations, “any document that is made in the course of business” is the property not of the person who authored it, but the property of the U.S. government. And so are its contents. It matters not whether the document, as this one, is unclassified.
Comey improperly and, perhaps, unlawfully leaked a government document involving an FBI investigation. Comey admitted he did it to prompt the appointment of a special counsel who is now tasked with examining Russia’s interference in the presidential election. At the very least, Comey violated government rules by converting government property for his own use. It does not matter, legally, that he was no longer employed by the FBI. Is it a crime?
Under 18 USC 793 (“Leaking Non-Classified Information”), it is a crime punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment to “willfully communicate or transmit national defense information,” even though it is not classified. While the contents of the memo do not deal directly with national defense matters, the overall investigation does. So it is debatable whether Comey could be charged.
this came out of hots posted article
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4597480
here is what was said about comey
Quote:
While the contents of the memo do not deal directly with national defense matters , the overall investigation does . So it is debatable whether Comey could be charged.
now here is the section of law being referenced in the proceedings because the overall investigation dose have to do with national defense.
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-tit...sec793.pdf
(0)
(0)