Go SFOR....... Permanent injunction seeked by SFO
Post# of 82672
Permanent injunction seeked by SFOR
Quote:
Defendants’ motion to stay pending inter partes review (“IPR”) should be denied because each of the three factors courts consider weigh against a stay. First, a stay would unduly prejudice StrikeForce and present a clear tactical advantage to defendants. Defendants and StrikeForce are direct competitors and all parties sell products covered by the ’698 patent. Defendant Duo alone boasts on its website that its sales have exponentially grown from $1M to $73M in just the past 4 years. This commercial success comes at the expense of StrikeForce, the rightful owner of the technology. Because of this, StrikeForce seeks a permanent injunction as one of its remedies
Zerify Inc (ZRFY) Stock Research Links
Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Get .... PrivacyLok https://cyberidguard.com/
Try SafeVchat: https://cyberidguard.com/
My comments are only my opinion and are not to be used for investment advice.
Please conduct your own due diligence before choosing to buy or sell any stock.