Clearly $0.08/kWh with 100,000 employees or $0.08/kWh with 1,000 employees is better, all other things being equal, but $0.09/kWh with 100,000 employees may not be better than $0.08/kWh with 1,000 employees. We don't have enough information to say.,
Regardless, I think cutting subsidies to solar companies could be good for QTMM because last time I checked, QTMM wasn't getting any. If QTMM has a more efficient, less expensive to produce technology, subsidies to other companies only cut their margins. Cutting subsidies should also free up capital in technologies that become economically non-viable that can now flow to technologies that are viable sans subsidy. That could be good for the share price too.
Regardless, I think cutting subsidies to solar companies could be good for QTMM because last time I checked, QTMM wasn't getting any. If QTMM has a more efficient, less expensive to produce technology, subsidies to other companies only cut their margins. Cutting subsidies should also free up capital in technologies that become economically non-viable that can now flow to technologies that are viable sans subsidy. That could be good for the share price too.
1
1