We don't know. It may be a normal update, with management wanting to have a chance to address shareholders' questions in a less stressful time. Remember they had to do taxes, the 10-Q, and who knows what to get ready for these conferences this summer. By early June all that stuff should be done -- no one starts writing a presentation the week before they go to the conference. Well, at least they shouldn't try to do that.....
Or there may be some kind of clinical trial update. But the fact that they want questions in advance says to me that this is just an ordinary, good shareholder-relations thing.
Please remember that bashers want to set up huge expectations, then when there isn't some huge news, they use that as an excuse to pound the stock. So don't fall into their trap -- let's just wait and see, and not build up huge expectations.
By the way I applaud their decision to require questions in advance. Just think of the level of discourse we've seen at lieHUB. Imagine having some of those people pipe up with BS -- there's no good way to handle disruptive, dishonest "questioners" that does anything but give the company a black eye.
Or there may be some kind of clinical trial update. But the fact that they want questions in advance says to me that this is just an ordinary, good shareholder-relations thing.
Please remember that bashers want to set up huge expectations, then when there isn't some huge news, they use that as an excuse to pound the stock. So don't fall into their trap -- let's just wait and see, and not build up huge expectations.
By the way I applaud their decision to require questions in advance. Just think of the level of discourse we've seen at lieHUB. Imagine having some of those people pipe up with BS -- there's no good way to handle disruptive, dishonest "questioners" that does anything but give the company a black eye.
3
