Can't have it both ways, Convict. You are sayi

Can't have it both ways, Convict.

You are saying they don't have an agreement (I never said recovery permit, nor did the article). But you are also saying that if they do have an agreement that they are breaking laws in some way.

SFRX is always wrong in your "book". Get it? "Book" because you claim to be writing a "book". Ha! So funny and absurd! Stupid and pathetic! Woo! Cracks me up every time I think about it.

You target novices. You consistently tout unknown information and frame everything as bad and against SFRX. "Just wait till the next part of the trial! Written word... blah blah blah... here's more cut and paste." But then that part comes and you and your corrupt side lose again. And again. And again. "But just wait till next time!"

Same here. Article says they have an agreement. Clarity would be good but you jump straight to either they are lying or they broke laws even though you don't actually know either way.

But what should we expect from a felon who's a paid shill making money pumping and dumping stocks and bashing others.