Your logic is really lacking Hawks. Why would any

Quote:

---

Your logic is really lacking Hawks. Why would anybody be anti vaccine without proof? What is there to gain. If they are wrong big pharma could go after them for slander or such?

---

Well there's some faulty logic right there. People are anti all kinds of things for many different reasons and completely without proof for their claims.

Fear is uppermost among reasons. And high fervor on just about any subject brooks no fact-based push-back.

Much of the anti-climate change reasons have been put forward by the fossil fuel industry, so there's an example of financial motivation.

The 9/11 'truthers' are as sure as they can be about their conspiracy theory, and they have been thoroughly debunked by engineers and by aviation experts.

I don't see that Pharma is all that concerned. Most of them are too diversified to be financially overexposed on the vaccine portfolio.

You need to re-read what I posted, and the reasons that what you refer to as 'honest studies' are also *scientifically irresponsible. Read it and don't waste my time on that again.

(*The control group' subjects could become very sick, they could die. That is evident in the real world, despite anecdotal claims to the contrary.)

The people that 'I support' are not only not questionable by knowledgeable people on the subject, they are on sound scientific ground.

Lastly, claiming that I'm the illogical one and the one susceptible to propaganda are ad hominem attacks that are usually only resorted to by people who've lost the argument on the facts.