Quote:But, I got to make a distinction. I believe we have a one party system disguised as two. And the ones doing the damage ae the ones in control, both parties.
I'm calling 'false equivalence' on that. I get the impulse to throw up your hands and state that they're all for shit. But one Party's policies are so clearly inimical to the health and safety of the rest of us I don't think it's arguable.
the 'deep state' stuff is conspiracy buff territory and there is nothing I can say that will change your mind.
Kennedy is indiscriminately against the things you list. He is anti-science on at least the anti-vax and climate change.
You're simply wrong about the safety of oil pipe lines in general and the safety record of the company behind the Keystone pl. in particular There are sound reasons not to build it above an aquifer that serves several parched States, if at all. And the sludge oil is strictly for export.
Quote:In the United States, Democrats are concerned that Keystone XL would not provide petroleum products for domestic use, but simply facilitate getting Alberta oil sands products to American coastal ports on the Gulf of Mexico for export to China and other countries.[62][dead link] In January 2015, Senate Republicans blocked a vote on an amendment proposed by Senator Edward J. Markey, D-Mass., which would have banned exports from the Keystone XL pipeline and required that the pipeline be built with steel from the United States.[156][
