ok Reading the posts I can only offer this observ

ok
Reading the posts I can only offer this observation/opinion.

The tecnology has been researched in labs extensively resulting in confirmed detection times. noted and posted by the company.

WHO and the Gates Foundation would not have requested the use on Nanologix products on on a whim or prayer. They just don't operate in such a manner! It would not be a point of arguement at all. This must have been extensively discussed and analized for some time I am sure between the participating parties involved. The responsible entities involved likewise would not have made this decision without substantial conversations with Nanologix regarding the technology and the potential to supply the product as needed.

At this stage it will become a field test, not a lab test, applied to real life circumstances with all of the variables that the human condition can possibly throw at it. I'm sure that this is the test needed by these organization to make a final determination as to how to proceed. Apparently the urgency is increasing for reasons I am not fully aware of, but the concern/urgency is looking to use the absolutely fastest most accurate product that produces results that can be detected and acted upon.

Let's see where this goes.

I'd say good luck but this is where we are at It seems luck is no longer a
factor at this juncture, the results will say it all.

Best Brett and the future of Nanologix!