I’m addressing this message to the entire board
Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 720)
Posted On: 05/10/2017 8:28:27 PM
I’m addressing this message to the entire board in hopes of squelching any concerns that TPAC shareholders and individuals who are serious investors might have after reading the continuous posts by “thesmalls” AKA “Carson”.
The intent is not to agitate or spark a long, boring tirade where everyone gets involved and just pisses everybody off. Below is a set of questions and answers that was posted today on Twitter. The questions were sent from Carson to S1 at S1’s request to hopefully end the harassing posts both on I hangout and Twitter. From what I understand, the questions are copied and pasted in Carson’s words so there is no mistaking what he is actually asking.
Note to Carson: You may not have anything to do but obsess about what you interpret and turn around to what you think you read, but we do. You are more exhausting than a 5 year old throwing a temper tantrum because they don’t like what they hear. I’m quite sure you will have a comeback to this in some form or fashion, but here’s the deal; no matter how much you want it to be different, this is the reality of the situation. You asked questions, you got your answers. Oh, and BTW, there is a set of questions for you to answer as well. How about it, are you ready to answer the “hard questions”?
[quoteS1 answers Carson hard questions. for the fifth time
Greetings TPAC Shareholders this is S1. Tonight I will be answer questions that Carson has presented that he feels are in deed for some reason hard questions.
Many of you have asked these same questions and was answered in direct tweets or by AFS E-List Publications.
No matter I will personally answer them again.
Before we start a little back ground. I was the first one to deal with Carson before the CC where he spoke with Ex IR manager James. I am the person that blocked Carson. I was the person that asked him why are you trying to agitate the Staff.
Carson has talked about Bills company trying to use IR (a news source)
Carson questions was answered and he was not ridiculed in any way. However he chose to be negative and for that he was blocked.
Today he returns to ask questions that truly have been answered more than 3 times. So lets see what we can do for him again this evening.
First question. Why the big misses on the $0.01 PPS & 1BB targets in 2016 if not yours whose-whose were they?
Answer, IR/S1 don't have misses because our functional role is to validate and report what CEO Bill Says and does. (Told Carson and you the shareholders this several times.) Bill runs his business and is responsible for all final decisions.
Answer: IR reported in the AFS E-List Publication that the targets would be changed because CEO Bill Mckay used more Preferred shares after the original numbers where calculated for the 90 days evaluation, to maintain TPAC operations. Fact.
Their even was a series of tweet between me S1and trader None, None discussing this in detail. I know because I had to block him as well. The FR told everyone that due to the maturity of the preferred shares that was due at the time ........and what's coming in 6months TPAC would have to rethink the PPS. If you check the Q's the amount of preferred share used is documented.
The FR also emailed a AFS E-List publication with the complete formula listing for calculating how TPAC arrives at the PPS figures. So this was indeed answered on several levels
Second Question: What is MRVB rev YTD for $TPAC has BTLSLA Commenced? What is the EST REV for 2017 What happened to the Guaranteed $13.5MM fr CC
Answer: The MRVB for TPAC just as IR completed its assignment was 7k as reported in the K, IR doesn't maintain the MRVB so for todays figures you will have to contact CEO Bill
The EST Revenue for 2017 had not been changed by CEO Bill as we completed the assignment. He had not reported any new data as IR completed the assignment, CEO Bill only statement was no information on BTL, Boeing and Bearings. If you want to know has any information changed you will have to contact Bill Directly.
As for BTL no new information had been reported to IR as to whether the Contract was in affect or not. IR was not updated by the CEO, Again we were not allowed to speak on BTL, Carson you were told that more than three times and every time you asked...... why TPAC didn't PR BTL , It is not a function of IR to write PR's or make day to day business decision other than who to block in twitter. Like you Carson.
Third Question:Is Australian SLA Dead for 2017 Will any EIA Revenues hit books 4 TPAC 1Q17 If Not –What happen happened 2017 EIA rev expectations
AU last report to IR was first quarter 2017. They said.... that they were still moving forward and hope to provide good news as the government was once again moving forward. They expressed they have a full team to negotiate Naval Contracts and they looked to bring one in by third quarter.
Well for EIA revenue.... now pass the 1 quarter of the year. TPAC Q didn't present much revenue you all have that information. Look for a better fourth quarter
Now what IR knows to date TPAC has opportunities and customers for E Transportation. CEO Bill has Tweeted and released a NWE for adding E-Technology Products to Trans Pacific Aerospace. He has not as of yet stated any dollar figures that IR/S1knows about. You will have to ask him about that.
However IR has tweeted and provided in an E-List Publication that the firm is in reconstruction. Shareholders should take each EIA project and study it carefully. This would shine more detail.
IR doesn't speculate and again TPAC had not prepared any new numbers different than the business time line. So what happen... CEO still has not changed the expectations. Still to early to count out any one Carson wait to hear from CEO Bill. IR is no longer responsible for TPACs financial or business development goals. So you will have to contact him directly if you need to know now.
Five: Finally when will anticipated share reduction be reflected in SEC filings What is target os for year $TPAC
TPAC share reduction program has started 800 million has been transferred in to the ICB, more is being transferred but this is not a quick process. the system allows validated shareholders to visit the screen. that simple. Going thru compliance takes time and is very costly,
TPAC shareholders looking for a quick turn around should not. The shares will be held within...... months of the reconstruction closure. That was the last reported information. TPAC shareholders wont see this process for another 18 to 24 months.
TPAC has a 36 month reconstruction of which 20 plus months exist. TPAC has a potential OS growth of 8 billion shares when looking at preferred. S7 tweeted this several times when TPAC moved to Wyoming. CEO called for all conversions to begin.
Using the FR calculations for just internal PPS. Any one should know TPAC will need a lot of cash on hand to release the shares for de-authorization. Spend all your money buying shares back then pay fees for compliance and certificates. With out a strong cash on hand how do you maintain a PPS. TPAC would be right where it is......... now........ over valued.
your questions have been answered as far as BTL at the point of IR leaving we had no information of a commencement. That's all we can say.
EIA contracts what we know is a sugar contract for 5 years but no financial instrument that TPAC can use.
TPACs EIA to move equipment to Africa is now in the works and looks really good, better than expected . TPAC has not talked about the value.
You know Carson you really try to demonstrate how smart you are.
Here is your questions
1, Why did you acquire an overvalued stock like TPAC. over valued 3000 + percent with 20yr experience
2, Why did you not pay attention to the Q's/K when it said TPAC didn't know if it doors was going to stay open.
3, Why a guy that now says hard questions didn't see that the use of Preferred shares rose more them 70 percent of OS. After the FR tried to limit the output.
4,Why did you maintain the stock during the .0072 when there was only 3,400 dollars in the TPAC bank.
5, You say You are long and strong, but up to 2016 TPAC had no contracts at all. Yet as a smart guy talking about IR....... that wasn't even there....... at the time you acquired. What about this demonstrates U R Smart. You still have a failing stock. that has fallen for 6 to 7 straight years.
6, What is your fault tolerance for TPAC
7, Why do you lie so much..
Ladies and gentlemen IR is no longer TPAC IR,.... your TPAC questions will be answered by CEO Bill McKay directly.
Carson I have answered your TPAC Pass questions, if you show up on @Irmoneymatters with a TPAC pass question I will block you again.
If you like to discuss the TPAC FIC no problem Irmoneymatters is not a TPAC product or service.
][/quote]
The intent is not to agitate or spark a long, boring tirade where everyone gets involved and just pisses everybody off. Below is a set of questions and answers that was posted today on Twitter. The questions were sent from Carson to S1 at S1’s request to hopefully end the harassing posts both on I hangout and Twitter. From what I understand, the questions are copied and pasted in Carson’s words so there is no mistaking what he is actually asking.
Note to Carson: You may not have anything to do but obsess about what you interpret and turn around to what you think you read, but we do. You are more exhausting than a 5 year old throwing a temper tantrum because they don’t like what they hear. I’m quite sure you will have a comeback to this in some form or fashion, but here’s the deal; no matter how much you want it to be different, this is the reality of the situation. You asked questions, you got your answers. Oh, and BTW, there is a set of questions for you to answer as well. How about it, are you ready to answer the “hard questions”?
[quoteS1 answers Carson hard questions. for the fifth time
Greetings TPAC Shareholders this is S1. Tonight I will be answer questions that Carson has presented that he feels are in deed for some reason hard questions.
Many of you have asked these same questions and was answered in direct tweets or by AFS E-List Publications.
No matter I will personally answer them again.
Before we start a little back ground. I was the first one to deal with Carson before the CC where he spoke with Ex IR manager James. I am the person that blocked Carson. I was the person that asked him why are you trying to agitate the Staff.
Carson has talked about Bills company trying to use IR (a news source)
Carson questions was answered and he was not ridiculed in any way. However he chose to be negative and for that he was blocked.
Today he returns to ask questions that truly have been answered more than 3 times. So lets see what we can do for him again this evening.
First question. Why the big misses on the $0.01 PPS & 1BB targets in 2016 if not yours whose-whose were they?
Answer, IR/S1 don't have misses because our functional role is to validate and report what CEO Bill Says and does. (Told Carson and you the shareholders this several times.) Bill runs his business and is responsible for all final decisions.
Answer: IR reported in the AFS E-List Publication that the targets would be changed because CEO Bill Mckay used more Preferred shares after the original numbers where calculated for the 90 days evaluation, to maintain TPAC operations. Fact.
Their even was a series of tweet between me S1and trader None, None discussing this in detail. I know because I had to block him as well. The FR told everyone that due to the maturity of the preferred shares that was due at the time ........and what's coming in 6months TPAC would have to rethink the PPS. If you check the Q's the amount of preferred share used is documented.
The FR also emailed a AFS E-List publication with the complete formula listing for calculating how TPAC arrives at the PPS figures. So this was indeed answered on several levels
Second Question: What is MRVB rev YTD for $TPAC has BTLSLA Commenced? What is the EST REV for 2017 What happened to the Guaranteed $13.5MM fr CC
Answer: The MRVB for TPAC just as IR completed its assignment was 7k as reported in the K, IR doesn't maintain the MRVB so for todays figures you will have to contact CEO Bill
The EST Revenue for 2017 had not been changed by CEO Bill as we completed the assignment. He had not reported any new data as IR completed the assignment, CEO Bill only statement was no information on BTL, Boeing and Bearings. If you want to know has any information changed you will have to contact Bill Directly.
As for BTL no new information had been reported to IR as to whether the Contract was in affect or not. IR was not updated by the CEO, Again we were not allowed to speak on BTL, Carson you were told that more than three times and every time you asked...... why TPAC didn't PR BTL , It is not a function of IR to write PR's or make day to day business decision other than who to block in twitter. Like you Carson.
Third Question:Is Australian SLA Dead for 2017 Will any EIA Revenues hit books 4 TPAC 1Q17 If Not –What happen happened 2017 EIA rev expectations
AU last report to IR was first quarter 2017. They said.... that they were still moving forward and hope to provide good news as the government was once again moving forward. They expressed they have a full team to negotiate Naval Contracts and they looked to bring one in by third quarter.
Well for EIA revenue.... now pass the 1 quarter of the year. TPAC Q didn't present much revenue you all have that information. Look for a better fourth quarter
Now what IR knows to date TPAC has opportunities and customers for E Transportation. CEO Bill has Tweeted and released a NWE for adding E-Technology Products to Trans Pacific Aerospace. He has not as of yet stated any dollar figures that IR/S1knows about. You will have to ask him about that.
However IR has tweeted and provided in an E-List Publication that the firm is in reconstruction. Shareholders should take each EIA project and study it carefully. This would shine more detail.
IR doesn't speculate and again TPAC had not prepared any new numbers different than the business time line. So what happen... CEO still has not changed the expectations. Still to early to count out any one Carson wait to hear from CEO Bill. IR is no longer responsible for TPACs financial or business development goals. So you will have to contact him directly if you need to know now.
Five: Finally when will anticipated share reduction be reflected in SEC filings What is target os for year $TPAC
TPAC share reduction program has started 800 million has been transferred in to the ICB, more is being transferred but this is not a quick process. the system allows validated shareholders to visit the screen. that simple. Going thru compliance takes time and is very costly,
TPAC shareholders looking for a quick turn around should not. The shares will be held within...... months of the reconstruction closure. That was the last reported information. TPAC shareholders wont see this process for another 18 to 24 months.
TPAC has a 36 month reconstruction of which 20 plus months exist. TPAC has a potential OS growth of 8 billion shares when looking at preferred. S7 tweeted this several times when TPAC moved to Wyoming. CEO called for all conversions to begin.
Using the FR calculations for just internal PPS. Any one should know TPAC will need a lot of cash on hand to release the shares for de-authorization. Spend all your money buying shares back then pay fees for compliance and certificates. With out a strong cash on hand how do you maintain a PPS. TPAC would be right where it is......... now........ over valued.
your questions have been answered as far as BTL at the point of IR leaving we had no information of a commencement. That's all we can say.
EIA contracts what we know is a sugar contract for 5 years but no financial instrument that TPAC can use.
TPACs EIA to move equipment to Africa is now in the works and looks really good, better than expected . TPAC has not talked about the value.
You know Carson you really try to demonstrate how smart you are.
Here is your questions
1, Why did you acquire an overvalued stock like TPAC. over valued 3000 + percent with 20yr experience
2, Why did you not pay attention to the Q's/K when it said TPAC didn't know if it doors was going to stay open.
3, Why a guy that now says hard questions didn't see that the use of Preferred shares rose more them 70 percent of OS. After the FR tried to limit the output.
4,Why did you maintain the stock during the .0072 when there was only 3,400 dollars in the TPAC bank.
5, You say You are long and strong, but up to 2016 TPAC had no contracts at all. Yet as a smart guy talking about IR....... that wasn't even there....... at the time you acquired. What about this demonstrates U R Smart. You still have a failing stock. that has fallen for 6 to 7 straight years.
6, What is your fault tolerance for TPAC
7, Why do you lie so much..
Ladies and gentlemen IR is no longer TPAC IR,.... your TPAC questions will be answered by CEO Bill McKay directly.
Carson I have answered your TPAC Pass questions, if you show up on @Irmoneymatters with a TPAC pass question I will block you again.
If you like to discuss the TPAC FIC no problem Irmoneymatters is not a TPAC product or service.
][/quote]
(4)
(0)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼