Matt, My education is far beyond yours. USUHS f
Post# of 9122
(Total Views: 270)
Posted On: 05/01/2017 8:50:37 PM
Matt,
My education is far beyond yours. USUHS for MD + ten years active duty in places you'd have trouble pronouncing. Now practice in Chicago area. I am not an insurance broker, as your buddy mistakenly tried to convey. I hope he's been sued for that one by the actual broker.
My complaint with you Matt is that you've been complaining since before your Swiss board. You might be a nice guy in person but what comes through here is a cross between a whiner and a bully. Sad that you didn't sell during that fraudulent run up in 2010? I read Mr Barnhizer's disclaimer where he clearly stated that no one with the company had any knowledge of who did the pump. I've also read countless posts over the years blaming him and Nanologix for letting the price fall after the pumpers sheared all the sheep who chased the price up. Were you one of those sheep, blaying about how great the price was? Sorry, but don't blame me or the rest of the real longs. You're what I call a provisional long, only here because you thought your stock was going to be $5 right after the $1. At the time there was nothing to the company that could support that. Now there is, as evidenced by papers and poster presentations where I'm sure you're challenged to understand their implications. I do understand, precisely because of my profession, my education, and my experience. I deal with MRSA frequently, sepsis more often simply because even the suburban idiots around here don't know what a simple cut or a scratch from fluffy can do.
I bought in much later, based upon REAL technology, not some crooked third party manipulation.
Scott
My education is far beyond yours. USUHS for MD + ten years active duty in places you'd have trouble pronouncing. Now practice in Chicago area. I am not an insurance broker, as your buddy mistakenly tried to convey. I hope he's been sued for that one by the actual broker.
My complaint with you Matt is that you've been complaining since before your Swiss board. You might be a nice guy in person but what comes through here is a cross between a whiner and a bully. Sad that you didn't sell during that fraudulent run up in 2010? I read Mr Barnhizer's disclaimer where he clearly stated that no one with the company had any knowledge of who did the pump. I've also read countless posts over the years blaming him and Nanologix for letting the price fall after the pumpers sheared all the sheep who chased the price up. Were you one of those sheep, blaying about how great the price was? Sorry, but don't blame me or the rest of the real longs. You're what I call a provisional long, only here because you thought your stock was going to be $5 right after the $1. At the time there was nothing to the company that could support that. Now there is, as evidenced by papers and poster presentations where I'm sure you're challenged to understand their implications. I do understand, precisely because of my profession, my education, and my experience. I deal with MRSA frequently, sepsis more often simply because even the suburban idiots around here don't know what a simple cut or a scratch from fluffy can do.
I bought in much later, based upon REAL technology, not some crooked third party manipulation.
Scott
(4)
(3)Nanologix Inc (NNLX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼