Please, the so-called "bashers" who are focused on
Post# of 9144
(Total Views: 462)
Posted On: 04/27/2017 5:31:59 PM
Please, the so-called "bashers" who are focused on the negatives of NanoLogix, would you help create strategic plans than you float to this board so that its members can critique and expand the proposals. It isn't enough to say that "NNLX should bring in a wealthy partner" unless there is a way to do this. It isn't productive to say that NNLX should publish detailed financials unless it is to "our" (the real shareholders) advantage to doing so. It isn't enough top say that the company "should have" gained sales with XYZ Company unless you have strategies for doing so on a very restricted budget.
All I am asking from those who have apparently spent 45-55 minutes viewing Buffett tapes and the like is that we pool our collective experience and wisdom and suggest a clear, productive, specific strategic plan that includes specific contacts, companies, targets, productive partners and the like.
Otherwise I feel like people who do not themselves have the slightest bit of experience about how to "grow" a technology company such as NanoLogix are way beyond their areas of competence. I have a bit of experience in many areas of interest but the last thing I ever allow myself to think is that I have all the answers in the dynamic and continually changing environment within which a company such as NanoLogix operates.
So, my suggestion is that all the people (Elsie, Rellvalue, Krazy, etc.) provide the rest of us with their best thoughts and strategic suggestions about the most effective ways to proceed. And this means specifically rather than in the most general terms. I' for example, could suggest that NNLX sell off to a giant company at a per share price of $50 but that isn't all that helpful.
All I am asking from those who have apparently spent 45-55 minutes viewing Buffett tapes and the like is that we pool our collective experience and wisdom and suggest a clear, productive, specific strategic plan that includes specific contacts, companies, targets, productive partners and the like.
Otherwise I feel like people who do not themselves have the slightest bit of experience about how to "grow" a technology company such as NanoLogix are way beyond their areas of competence. I have a bit of experience in many areas of interest but the last thing I ever allow myself to think is that I have all the answers in the dynamic and continually changing environment within which a company such as NanoLogix operates.
So, my suggestion is that all the people (Elsie, Rellvalue, Krazy, etc.) provide the rest of us with their best thoughts and strategic suggestions about the most effective ways to proceed. And this means specifically rather than in the most general terms. I' for example, could suggest that NNLX sell off to a giant company at a per share price of $50 but that isn't all that helpful.
(6)
(1)