"However, due to the unprecedented attempts to sab
Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 326)
Posted On: 04/27/2017 10:44:31 AM
Re: mikemc1001 #18748
"However, due to the unprecedented attempts to sabotage the companies forward progress, they are starting to keep business dealings very close to the vest."
I have no problem with that. I was around for the Timkin fiasco. However, it is a catch 22 for investors when doing their own DD: in order to really "know what you own," you have to dig beyond just the standard reports and PRs. After a number of PRs/contracts/iniatives fail to materialize-it is reasonable for investors to push in their DD. Trust but verify.
That being said, how does providing revenue guidance on: SLAs, MRVBs, EIAs, and now bikes/trikes give any fodder to bashers? If the compang substantiates the revenues - there is nothing to attack (other than applying past history). 1Q is well over and there hasnt even been a mention of what transpried revenue wise during the quarter. Did any of the SLAs (primarily the two announced) start/produce rev? Did MRVBs provide rev? Did any of the EIA projects get off the ground? How does this help investors by witholding this? I would argue doing so provides more fodder for bashers. Unless the idea IS to drive the price down for buyback/reverse merger/etc all of which would be purposeful manipulation and illegal.
I have no problem with that. I was around for the Timkin fiasco. However, it is a catch 22 for investors when doing their own DD: in order to really "know what you own," you have to dig beyond just the standard reports and PRs. After a number of PRs/contracts/iniatives fail to materialize-it is reasonable for investors to push in their DD. Trust but verify.
That being said, how does providing revenue guidance on: SLAs, MRVBs, EIAs, and now bikes/trikes give any fodder to bashers? If the compang substantiates the revenues - there is nothing to attack (other than applying past history). 1Q is well over and there hasnt even been a mention of what transpried revenue wise during the quarter. Did any of the SLAs (primarily the two announced) start/produce rev? Did MRVBs provide rev? Did any of the EIA projects get off the ground? How does this help investors by witholding this? I would argue doing so provides more fodder for bashers. Unless the idea IS to drive the price down for buyback/reverse merger/etc all of which would be purposeful manipulation and illegal.
(1)
(0)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼