Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. User Boards ›
  4. Chris20 Pete Mick and friends Message Board

$JPM #2 / Where Dodd-Frank Should Go from Here CON

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (0)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 2218
(Total Views: 75)
Posted On: 04/23/2017 2:27:14 PM
Posted By: mick
$JPM #2 / Where Dodd-Frank Should Go from Here CONGRESS HAS TO ACT

Again, I would not argue that Dodd-Frank should be wholly removed.

But I think the best we can hope for is a thorough analysis for understanding what rules worked effectively, keep those, and then consider removing the rules that aren’t working and that are inhibiting fundamental bank functions, like lending.

$JPM
For example, at J.P. Morgan they have over $30 billion in capital reserves that Dimon refers to as “permanently idle capital,”
because not only can the bank not lend or invest that money – they can’t do anything with it.

Such is the case for about $2.5 trillion in excess reserves parked at
banks today. Some statutes in Dodd-Frank require banks to maintain
certain capital ratios
– which is important
– but it is arguably a bit overreaching.

Perhaps a modification is in order to loosen controls over how banks use their liquidity and capital.

Many banks surveyed say that reducing such requirements would
encourage them to lend more, which is one of the basic engines of economic growth.

There is a long road ahead. Legislative action is required to overturn laws,
so even if Congress was fully committed and unified for deregulation and reform, it must take the slow and arduous path to tweaking the law. So far,

Congress’s ability to accomplish such a feat has been less than convincing. There was not even a vote on the
American Healthcare Act.

And, given the administration’s higher priorities of tax reform and immigration, it is likely wishful thinking to assume that change will come fast.



(0)
(0)








Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us