You basically agreed with me. You said that "Owcp
Post# of 15624
(Total Views: 472)
Posted On: 04/17/2017 11:32:01 PM
You basically agreed with me. You said that "Owcp will be just fine" ... "when bigger money comes". I said the exact same thing, "when bigger money comes". What you fail to discuss is what happens until then and how long it will take for that to happen. It will take bigger money for this thing to take off into uncharted territory.
And 1990, you are not exactly spotless either. It is impossible to predict everything with accuracy, but the pumpers here have been even less accurate in their predictions. I also made it clear that I said that it would hit 1.65 because in Dave's Investors Hangout video he made it clear that if it breaks 1.20, it will be ready to take off. Is it just a coincidence that it took a nosedive or is it the result of a pump and dump manipulation? After it went from 1.37 to .89, I then said that it would tank because Dave listed .94 as the support line above .50 and it went down to .87. Why did you not argue the analysis in technical terms when you had the chance then?
I'm looking at your list of posts. You said that "I hate the site. but it still is important to get the word out on OWCP. I mainly just want to troll the bashers." If you yourself are so unbiased, why do you not troll the pumpers? The absolute value of -3 is the same as the absolute value of +3. Pumpers and bashers are equally a problem, so please take a more unbiased approach.
Also, a few of you have mentioned that I Hub does not allow videos from I Hangout to be posted there. That's not the whole story. Any time I type the word hangout, it gets deleted as spam. I Hub considers I Hangout to be a competitive threat. You have to be more subtle. Allude to I Hangout in your I Hub profile, footers, private message, etc. thats the way to bring them here.
I will give 2 examples of posts that I made that were deleted:
"I have a better idea. how about you look at the chart in the Investors Hangout video. It clearly explains how close the bollinger bands are, implying volatility. the video also discusses the gap at 0041. Please comment after you watched the video. I want to know your thoughts on the video and if you agree with that analysis."
"Actually, according to Investors Hangout, if it breaks .70, then .53 comes fast. If it breaks .53, then .18 will hit fast. I would up your bid from .14 to about .20-.25."
If anyone can see anything wrong with my above 2 posts, aside from the Investors Hangout reference, please entertain me.
And 1990, you are not exactly spotless either. It is impossible to predict everything with accuracy, but the pumpers here have been even less accurate in their predictions. I also made it clear that I said that it would hit 1.65 because in Dave's Investors Hangout video he made it clear that if it breaks 1.20, it will be ready to take off. Is it just a coincidence that it took a nosedive or is it the result of a pump and dump manipulation? After it went from 1.37 to .89, I then said that it would tank because Dave listed .94 as the support line above .50 and it went down to .87. Why did you not argue the analysis in technical terms when you had the chance then?
I'm looking at your list of posts. You said that "I hate the site. but it still is important to get the word out on OWCP. I mainly just want to troll the bashers." If you yourself are so unbiased, why do you not troll the pumpers? The absolute value of -3 is the same as the absolute value of +3. Pumpers and bashers are equally a problem, so please take a more unbiased approach.
Also, a few of you have mentioned that I Hub does not allow videos from I Hangout to be posted there. That's not the whole story. Any time I type the word hangout, it gets deleted as spam. I Hub considers I Hangout to be a competitive threat. You have to be more subtle. Allude to I Hangout in your I Hub profile, footers, private message, etc. thats the way to bring them here.
I will give 2 examples of posts that I made that were deleted:
"I have a better idea. how about you look at the chart in the Investors Hangout video. It clearly explains how close the bollinger bands are, implying volatility. the video also discusses the gap at 0041. Please comment after you watched the video. I want to know your thoughts on the video and if you agree with that analysis."
"Actually, according to Investors Hangout, if it breaks .70, then .53 comes fast. If it breaks .53, then .18 will hit fast. I would up your bid from .14 to about .20-.25."
If anyone can see anything wrong with my above 2 posts, aside from the Investors Hangout reference, please entertain me.
(0)
(1)OWC Pharmaceutical Research Corp. (OWCP) Stock Research Links
Be advised that if someone attacks me, that post is not removed, but my response will always be removed. These mods are not unbiased, especially 1, so I have to be extra careful.
Here is what happens when the mods are against me: if I make even 1 mistake, the admins will uphold the deletion by the mods, but if someone attacks me, violating pretty much every rule, then a simple mod refusal to delete is enough and the admins do not get involved.
Also, I am the only person who does not get enraged at others' posts, mostly because I am unbiased. I am in search of the truth. Those who abuse the most have huge stakes in the company and therefore want to silence those who disagree with them
Here is what happens when the mods are against me: if I make even 1 mistake, the admins will uphold the deletion by the mods, but if someone attacks me, violating pretty much every rule, then a simple mod refusal to delete is enough and the admins do not get involved.
Also, I am the only person who does not get enraged at others' posts, mostly because I am unbiased. I am in search of the truth. Those who abuse the most have huge stakes in the company and therefore want to silence those who disagree with them