Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that
Post# of 15624
I bring this up because many posters seem to believe we still need Teva, or someone like them. I don't believe that's the case. Furthermore, I believe that what OWCP has done is far more lucrative for them than a partnership with the likes of TEVA on other big Pharma. Why? Because in such partnership, the best I've seen in general is no better than royalties in the teens, and frequently they're in single digits. OWCP is ticketed to receive the greater portion of earnings from sales.
I know that OWCP doesn't have the entire world covered by agreements to date, but I'd rather see additional similar agreements where essentially they're contracting with others to do these services rather than a partnership where essentially the partner takes control, and takes the lion's share of the earnings.
Gary