well, that's sensible...except I think you need t

well, that's sensible...except

Quote:

---

I think you need to put things in the proper time context.

Those shares were issued before the "no dilution" statement was made.

---

Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=447...z4dxLKnZhQ

for the issuances. and the question of when those shares have matured. when the restrictive legends can be lifted. shares processed. made ready for liquidation

isn't one and the same. keep in mind. most restrictions have 6-12 mo holds on them, debentures tend to the former ( or earlier in some cases). so one can say, i stopped issuing shares

but the shares a co issued 3, 6 or 12 months ago are now coming to market. and that's where investors get "diluted". when those shares get "liquidated", "sold", et.al


some will engage in word-play. a co can claim they aren't "issuing" any shares . but that doesn't mean shares aren't being "diluted" to market. from past issuances having matured (come off restriction )

no one who is even remotely informed. should be claiming "no dilution" . since there's actual filings. a ta. and proof that says otherwise

that doesn't make ntek a bad investment . doesn't mean the price can't go up