Elsie, Negativity doesn't rule. The post contai

Elsie,

Negativity doesn't rule. The post contained the words "could it be" in speculating which philanthropic organization could be involved. That's valid speculation and should not be considered a pump any more than your absolutely unbiased critical postings should not be considered bashing...right?

Here's a process of partial elimination for you: if multiple US Federal Government agencies are involved in the funding, I'll bet they're NOT

•Department of Agriculture
•Department of Commerce
•Department of Education
•Department of Energy
•Department of Housing and Urban Development
•Department of the Interior
•Department of Justice
•Department of Labor
•Department of Transportation
•Department of the Treasury
•Department of Veterans Affairs

and I'll bet they could be:

•Department of Health and Human Services
1)Centers For Disease Control (CDC)
2)National Institutes of Health (NIH)
3)National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
4)Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
(BARDA)
•Department of State
•Department of Homeland Security
•Department of Defense
1)Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)

Not pumping, just speculating. After all, isn't that part of investment DD? BTW, it's a partial list of potential participants.

Scott