Nice cop out.....all you had to do was copy and paste the plus 25% third party notes.
"We recognize that some commenters have criticized privacy notice requirements as providing incomplete protections for consumers. Notices by themselves do not give consumers the power to control their information; notices are not always read or understood, and newer developments in tracking and analytics can reveal more about consumers than most people realize"
"While we recognize that there are other participants in the Internet ecosystem that can also see and collect consumer data, the record is clear that BIAS providers' gatekeeper position allows them to see every packet that a consumer sends and receives over the Internet while on the network, including, absent encryption, its contents. By contrast, edge providers only see a slice of any given consumers Internet traffic. As explained in the record, edge providers' visibility into consumers' web browsing activity is necessarily limited. According to the record, only three companies (Google, Facebook, and Twitter) have third party tracking capabilities across more than 10 percent of the top one million Web sites, and none of those have access to more than approximately 25 percent of Web pages. "
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/201...s-services
.......so the argument suggests that a "so called" smaller amount of theft is fine. So then maybe we should let go 25% of all thieves locked up in prison....because ........well.....they're ok.
Read the law.....because you are just admitting that it is ok for "others" to steal your information and monetize such. This "dead" law empowered one over the other. Amazing to think that it is fair for Google Fiber to have a means of monetizing your so called privacy through Google.
How about a law that is fair and equal...and meant to truly protect. This law empowered others and does nothing to protect.
"We recognize that some commenters have criticized privacy notice requirements as providing incomplete protections for consumers. Notices by themselves do not give consumers the power to control their information; notices are not always read or understood, and newer developments in tracking and analytics can reveal more about consumers than most people realize"
"While we recognize that there are other participants in the Internet ecosystem that can also see and collect consumer data, the record is clear that BIAS providers' gatekeeper position allows them to see every packet that a consumer sends and receives over the Internet while on the network, including, absent encryption, its contents. By contrast, edge providers only see a slice of any given consumers Internet traffic. As explained in the record, edge providers' visibility into consumers' web browsing activity is necessarily limited. According to the record, only three companies (Google, Facebook, and Twitter) have third party tracking capabilities across more than 10 percent of the top one million Web sites, and none of those have access to more than approximately 25 percent of Web pages. "
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/201...s-services
.......so the argument suggests that a "so called" smaller amount of theft is fine. So then maybe we should let go 25% of all thieves locked up in prison....because ........well.....they're ok.
Read the law.....because you are just admitting that it is ok for "others" to steal your information and monetize such. This "dead" law empowered one over the other. Amazing to think that it is fair for Google Fiber to have a means of monetizing your so called privacy through Google.
How about a law that is fair and equal...and meant to truly protect. This law empowered others and does nothing to protect.
2
