note NON RETAILs' playbook agenda change out on P2

note NON RETAILs' playbook agenda change out on P2O over the last weeks

years ago .. when NR (non retail) was far less in their abusive hole re: PTOI
than they are now ..

cycle of money was key .. the way that works is a crew fronts .. RUNs .. then
does the hand off to the CON side of the crew .. who enters a few months
b4 the *RUN* (9.9.09 for a 12/2009 illegal stock manipulation round 1 on PTOI)
this is done for *noise/drama and to entice new investors ..

most retail are unsophisticated .. 99% of professionals in the industry would
never steer their clients into a stock (regardless of where traded) that is below
5.00

but the OTC is a whole other kettle of fish .. literally and the rot embedded
can be laid at the doorstep of the SEC

so when the first round was done .. PTOI had a 1M abusive position never covered
in NR's initial hand off

that wouldn't change even with the events of 2010 unfolding .. in fact imo the
1M abusive short was added to each and every year including this one (2017)

again based on aromatics *behavior* .. and overlapping efforts by NR
it's crystal clear as to why NR felt they could outlast .. both the company
and the stock's retail investors .. after all their %s (trotted out by crews
*there* CONsistently) were in NRs' favor

but this brings us back to why P2O investors (not including traders here) are so different

and so indicative of the old school style investor .. or for some of us .. early
into an emerging sector .. recognizing the risk along side the reward potential
provided the company first *survives* .. and then can THRIVE ..

for years P2O's competition (one company in particular) was forced down P2O
investors' throats .. there ..

the fact that there could be no true comparison between P2O (pubco) and
the competition (private company) .. eluded .. (deliberately) NRs' trolls daily

again it's all part of the playbook .. of making positive anything >> negative
and negative >> presumably/potentially .. Fatal

it's all designed to part actual shareholders from their shares

so in mid August 2013 .. P2O was wrested back .. flagship was operational
and clearly based on mr. methodical and conservative's input .. dots could
be connected that multiple buyers of interest saw 3 in operation

this is why *volume* matters .. when NR loses *outcome control* aspects have to change

it's why there was no honeymoon for RH's initial infusion of monies on 9.30.13
and why within 3 months PTOI would go from 35c to 10c

there has been nothing remotely normal about PTOI's *trading* since P2O was wrested back

it's why we are now seeing *chatter* about P2O's first sale not mattering ..

yeah as if ..

or *market cap* valuation ..

as if .. there is any correlation to *reality* after 9 years of bogus BS against P2O and PTOI

NR has a massive problem of their own making on PTOI (stock) with P2O's first sale

because P2O's first sale engenders *change*

and it's that change that brings the interest of new investors ..

and everyone with *interest* .. provided they actually have some basic business competency .. knows it

in 2017 .. for the first time ever as a pubco .. P2O controls PTOI

not the shits who do what they do .. (as evidenced by last week's *efforts*)
done to CONfuse boxes of rocks .. who are most likely long gone as *investors*

in spite of all the whining .. not one of the boxes of rocks .. provides time stamps .. let alone presumably *sells*

i was hopeful last Wednesday's round of *volume* would elicit a time stamp
by at least one who whines there .. regularly .. no such luck

4kids