Agreed as far as brand messaging goes, a re-launch is a re-launch. Let hope its very different. I think anyone who is a long here is expecting that. The smart play is to evaluate where what went wrong keep what works and make changes to those that didn't and proceed forward. Respectfully LT a fool would throw it all away and start new, and that not what is happening here either. If it did all of our shares would be worth 0.00. Plenty of the old was right on track and is in use with the company, to include Tony. We had a few of the wrong players. So going forward, like any team its about recruiting the right players. That's what creates winners. That's what is happening and will turn us around. Regardless of the name. My first Baltia buy was 1200 shares 11/04/2003 at 0.225/share. I have taken over companies, and turned around facilities myself. I always respect the history, its how we keep from repeating the mistakes of the past. I like the name suggestion US Voyager Airlines (USVA) because it respects the history and reflects on the future. Its a reminder of both things. Commercial air travel could also have a future in space, Voyager 1 and 2 were explorers to study the solar system space and the outer planets. So while I appreciate your thoughts, don't forget the past and try and expect a brighter future....