James/IR/S7 - nowhere in that long rant did you di
Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 621)
Posted On: 04/02/2017 9:58:16 PM
James/IR/S7 - nowhere in that long rant did you discuss revenues going forward for 2017. Nowhere did you show line of sight to what has been done during these reconstructions and how they line up with revenue going forward. You complain that we are turning off new investors by being critical but why in the world would one invest after that tirade? What did you say to attract new investors or convince them to delve deeper?
You infer those that are critical are directly slamming/attacking Bill McKay. However, you go on to say rather emphatically:
"I am smart enough not to have TPAC shares, U R Not." So - for those that bought based on Bill's business plan, his conference call, his tweets, his commitment to shareholders, etc - were they all stupid for listening to Bill? Were they stupid when he stated this was a long term venture? You cant have it both ways. That is what a long term buy and hold investment is. The most successful investors throughout history (in terms of total wealth generation) have consistently been buy and hold value investors (Buffet, Lynch, etc). While PTCs do not fall in their realm - one can find inherent value in these stocks. However, it takes significant DD, patience, and a certain amount of faith that you arent being blatantly lied to (in reports, filings, PRs, CCs, etc).
To say that IR does not represent $TPAC is blatantly false. They have been listed numerous times as the IR/Investor Relations on company PRs, Bill has directed SHs to them for basic information, they use the TPAC domain for emails, and they host CCs on behalf of the SHs. All one has to do is go back through @TPACmuse or @TPACbearings tweets or company issued PRs and look at the numerous references.
You start out calling posters idiots (including me later in your rant). Yet you cant even take the time to proof read your post and make it coherent. Again - how does that atrocious writing attract new investors or compel them to look into the company further (let alone what you are pushing on the MRVB/ARC side)? Why would anyone take you seriously when you constantly and immediately any one that asks basic questions or is remotely critical?
Ignoring anything else - James specifically commented and took ownership of the PPS target and OS reduction in the 2016 CC. Hewas not passing on information. Listen to the CC. You directly answered that OS question and made the commitment to the time frame and OS range. Period.
You infer those that are critical are directly slamming/attacking Bill McKay. However, you go on to say rather emphatically:
"I am smart enough not to have TPAC shares, U R Not." So - for those that bought based on Bill's business plan, his conference call, his tweets, his commitment to shareholders, etc - were they all stupid for listening to Bill? Were they stupid when he stated this was a long term venture? You cant have it both ways. That is what a long term buy and hold investment is. The most successful investors throughout history (in terms of total wealth generation) have consistently been buy and hold value investors (Buffet, Lynch, etc). While PTCs do not fall in their realm - one can find inherent value in these stocks. However, it takes significant DD, patience, and a certain amount of faith that you arent being blatantly lied to (in reports, filings, PRs, CCs, etc).
To say that IR does not represent $TPAC is blatantly false. They have been listed numerous times as the IR/Investor Relations on company PRs, Bill has directed SHs to them for basic information, they use the TPAC domain for emails, and they host CCs on behalf of the SHs. All one has to do is go back through @TPACmuse or @TPACbearings tweets or company issued PRs and look at the numerous references.
You start out calling posters idiots (including me later in your rant). Yet you cant even take the time to proof read your post and make it coherent. Again - how does that atrocious writing attract new investors or compel them to look into the company further (let alone what you are pushing on the MRVB/ARC side)? Why would anyone take you seriously when you constantly and immediately any one that asks basic questions or is remotely critical?
Ignoring anything else - James specifically commented and took ownership of the PPS target and OS reduction in the 2016 CC. Hewas not passing on information. Listen to the CC. You directly answered that OS question and made the commitment to the time frame and OS range. Period.
(8)
(0)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼