That response makes no sense whatsoever: "still ca
Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 322)
Posted On: 03/31/2017 10:19:00 AM
Re: Ragz2Richez #18510
That response makes no sense whatsoever: "still can't figure out what all the rest of us have? you will not get guidance because you cannot be trusted. "
Providing public guidance in an open forum ensure equal access for all. You cant "mistrust" what an individual will do with public guidance. That is absurd.
Kmohr responds to another poster that revenues were addressed 137 days ago yet the same poseter is mocked for being uninformed. Supposedly (according to company tweets/PRs) a lot has happened in the last 137 days. We are told to ignore Ks and Qs and instead refer to a timeline that hasnt been updated in 137 days?
Once again - NONE of you have addressed what 2017 revenues will be nor asked the question to IR in their supposed open format. They respond to selected emails and there is no guarantee they will. Instead they can simply claim they didnt receive one - very convenient. It is absolutely obvious they read this board since they go out of their way to quote messages on here from posters in their twitlonger rebuttals. Once again - no where in these diatribes laden with personal insults and (poorly written) wordsoup do they or have they addressed the one question: what is the CURRENT guidance/expectations for revenues for TPAC for 2017?
Do they not have a clue?
Do they know they will be awful to non existent?
Do they not want to share so they can continue to frustrate shareholders into selling?
Are the SLAs, EIAs, MRVB revenues so fragile that it is impossible to give a confident range?
One question. Still no answer. And for those of you that want to default to "email them" - I did. Yesterday. One line, one question. No response.
Providing public guidance in an open forum ensure equal access for all. You cant "mistrust" what an individual will do with public guidance. That is absurd.
Kmohr responds to another poster that revenues were addressed 137 days ago yet the same poseter is mocked for being uninformed. Supposedly (according to company tweets/PRs) a lot has happened in the last 137 days. We are told to ignore Ks and Qs and instead refer to a timeline that hasnt been updated in 137 days?
Once again - NONE of you have addressed what 2017 revenues will be nor asked the question to IR in their supposed open format. They respond to selected emails and there is no guarantee they will. Instead they can simply claim they didnt receive one - very convenient. It is absolutely obvious they read this board since they go out of their way to quote messages on here from posters in their twitlonger rebuttals. Once again - no where in these diatribes laden with personal insults and (poorly written) wordsoup do they or have they addressed the one question: what is the CURRENT guidance/expectations for revenues for TPAC for 2017?
Do they not have a clue?
Do they know they will be awful to non existent?
Do they not want to share so they can continue to frustrate shareholders into selling?
Are the SLAs, EIAs, MRVB revenues so fragile that it is impossible to give a confident range?
One question. Still no answer. And for those of you that want to default to "email them" - I did. Yesterday. One line, one question. No response.
(3)
(0)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼